Q: I occasionally read that a major TV news network has paid people involved in a dramatic news story large fees for exclusive interviews, amateur videos and participation in subsequent TV specials. I’ve also heard that some sports teams grant media companies that pay seven-digit "partnership" fees special access (to press conferences, coaches and players), and restrict the access of those that don’t. What do you think about the ethics of these arrangements?
A: Not much. This kind of "checkbook journalism"—long common in Great Britain and among sensational tabloid papers in the U.S.—is on the rise among mainstream broadcast networks and Internet media sites. It is a disturbing trend.
I agree with the ethics committee of the Society of Professional Journalists, whose position paper says that "checkbook journalism is not only unethical, it threatens to undermine journalism and damage democracy." Readers and viewers, the committee warns, are left "wondering whether the [paid] source is telling the truth, telling the [news outlet] what it wants to hear, or embellishing the truth."
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
It continues: "Paying for information creates a conflict of interest [in the news organization]. Asking tough questions, examining the motives, weighing the credibility of a source—all of these journalistic functions become intricately more complicated when the source is someone receiving money for a story."
If the business managers of news media feel compelled to pay their citizen news sources, the financial relationship should be disclosed at the start of the story. So far, editorial employees, perhaps fearing for their jobs in this precarious media climate, have not insisted on this.
Similarly, sports reporters should stand up for the rights of peers who are locked out of legitimate news stories because their employers haven't paid for preferential treatment. Regrettably, that hasn't happened yet, either.
Have a money-and-ethics question you’d like answered in this column? Write to editor in chief Knight Kiplinger at ethics@kiplinger.com.
-
What Will Happen With Health Costs in 2023Business Costs & Regulation Higher drug costs are likely to accelerate health insurance premium increases.
-
Airbnb Host Tells What It's LikeBusiness Costs & Regulation This Denver pharmacist began booking her ski condo a few months after the pandemic hit.
-
New Platforms for a Comedy CoupleCoronavirus and Your Money COVID forced them to expand their stand-up repertoire to YouTube and podcasts.
-
This Vet is on the Frontlines of the Pandemic Pet ProblemCoronavirus and Your Money Lisa Gretebeck used telemedicine and other creative ways to handle a surge of new cat and dog patients.
-
Tying the Knot Post-PandemicBusiness Costs & Regulation This wedding planner is gearing up for a full fall season amid continuing concerns about safety.
-
Fintech: The Bank DisruptersFinancial Planning Fintechs offer mostly free accounts with tantalizing yields and slick features, but don’t expect much hand-holding.
-
Tough Times for a Family BusinessBusiness Costs & Regulation His dry-cleaning operation was rocked by the pandemic, but he is staying optimistic.
-
IRS Gives Truckers a Tax Break in Response to the Colonial Pipeline ShutdownTax Breaks The tax penalty for using dyed diesel fuel for highway use is temporarily suspended.
