Give a Gift

Smart Technology

Eight Innovations that Will Change
Your Future

No personal jet packs at the big-box store just yet, but we foresee technological breakthroughs that will make a real difference.

By Jim Ostroff, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

December 9, 2009
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

Kiplinger clients have long come to rely on Kiplinger editors’ early insights into new technology and other exciting developments that eventually would make life easier and more enjoyable for all of us. Examples of "you read it in Kiplinger" include the coming of commercial air routes in 1927, the early development of television in the 1930s, electronic office machines in 1953 and mobile phones in 1983.

What will be the tech breakthroughs of the next decade? Watch the energy and transportation sectors. Here are eight forecasts pulled from the pages of The Kiplinger Letter in 2009 that look at some promising developments to come -- everything from spray-on solar cells to new ways of relieving traffic congestion. Offer your own thoughts and predictions in the reader discussion area.

Related Links


See these innovations as a slide show



Think an all-electric car is out of your budget range? Maybe not. A $25,000 model from U.S. upstart Aptera Motors is close to commercial rollout. You’ll know it when you see it -- a bullet shaped three-wheeler about the size of a Toyota Prius. The range: 140 miles. Buyers have already put down deposits on the first 4,000 to come off the assembly lines. Those orders will be filled by August 2010. It’ll take a year or so longer for General Motors, Nissan and Toyota to produce plug-ins, and they’ll cost more and have shorter ranges. GM’s Chevy Volt, for example, will sell for $40,000 after rebates and will go only 40 miles per charge.

Imagine converting motion -- from auto traffic or pedestrians -- to electricity. Tests are already under way to convert to electrical power the repeated pounding of tires on busy roads and tollbooth lanes or of commuters running to catch the subway. It could be used to run simple devices, leaving no carbon footprint. It may even be possible for joggers to use their footsteps to run cell phones and iPods. The technology could be in use in five years or so if the tests are successful.

New technologies to unsnarl traffic are on the horizon: Traffic management systems that combine video devices with computer logic will reduce collisions, reroute motorists and allow real-time adjustments to signals. They’ll be sorely needed to help ease major congestion that not only frustrates motorists but also slows business shipping and delivery.

The energy storage business will grow 10-fold over the next 20 years. A slew of promising technological developments on the horizon will both provide benefit to energy users and benefit from investment. Among them: Energy storage systems, such as flow batteries -- in effect, reverse fuel cells -- that can store unused wind and solar energy for use later when it is needed. Conventional lead-acid battery arrays will grow much bigger. And watch for a system that stores compressed air: At night, when demand is typically low, wind-made electricity would run pumps that compress air into underground caverns. In daytime, released air would turn turbines to make electricity.

Ever heard of thorium power? You will. Thorium is a naturally occurring element, slightly radioactive, that is far more common in the ground than uranium. The first nuclear reactor fueled by thorium will be built in about five years, with more to come. Thorium has a lot of practical advantages over the more commonly used uranium, and it can churn out the same amount of emission-free electricity to power the U.S. Thorium is safer, produces less waste and is abundant here in the U.S. Plus it’s less likely to cause accidents and can’t be used by terrorists for dirty bombs.

North Dakota as an oil patch state? Yes, probably in a decade or less. The state’s Three Forks-Sanish formation could rival nearby Bakken Play, a vast oil shale field. Together they could provide the equivalent of 30 years’ worth of U.S. oil needs. Oil companies are already scurrying to stake claims to the bonanza. New drilling and recovery technologies make the fields ripe for production. They sit a mile beneath the surface and, until recently, were mostly inaccessible. Though drilling has begun, big-time commercial production at Three Forks is five years away.

Space based power plants are no longer just a science fiction fantasy. Pacific Gas and Electric aims to supply 250,000 customers from one by 2016. The California utility inked a deal with Solaren Corp. for 200 megawatts of electricity -- power to be generated by an orbiting solar cell plant and transmitted as microwaves to Fresno, where it will be converted to electricity. Solaren, PowerSat, Space Energy and others working on orbital power are getting a lift from state laws requiring more use of renewable sources. And they figure they’ll have a steady customer in the Defense Department, which wants a means of getting power to troops in remote areas.

Spray-on solar cells will shake up the electricity market by 2015. University and private labs in the U.S., Australia, Switzerland and Canada are developing cost-effective plastic coatings containing microscopic particles of copper, indium, gallium and titanium. Painted on building rooftops and exteriors, they’ll absorb sunlight and produce electricity just as bulky solar panels do now. One big plus: The cell coatings could generate power even on cloudy days, making this solar catcher up to three times more efficient than today’s solar modules. That’ll give them the potential to cut a company’s electricity purchases by 50% to 75% and even offer some companies the chance to sell power to utilities when their own needs ebb.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.



DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (10)

Posted by: Joseph at 12/10/2009 11:36:42 AM

more info on the spray-on solar cells. What companies are the leaders of this discovery and who will be manufactureing these products. Sounds like an interesting investment opportunity.

Posted by: Bob at 12/10/2009 02:08:29 PM

Interesting story with a lot of financial scam potential. Many people will be duped into investing in these and other sure fire innovations. I was just reflecting on the 1930s when my grandparents had many of the modern electric conveniences and lived off of the grid. Grandpa had a hand whittled windmill blade for the generator on top of the garage. He also had a huge bank of handmade wet batteries using dissimilar metals from the local scrap yard. Then there was his Delco system which generated and stored electricity on a daily basis. And of course the furnace which also heated the hot water. There were the two water systems. One used rain water stored in a cistern which provided soft water for washing and baths along with the well and its storage system that provided water for drinking and cooking. In the back yard was the root cellar which held a years supply of food and provided shelter against the occasional tornado that swept though the area. So please excuse me for not being too impressed with many of the innovations that will change our future. I've already seen them in the past.

Posted by: Seth Warner at 12/11/2009 06:55:16 AM

Please note that nuclear power is NOT emissions free. One of the big negatives noted 30 years ago in this same discussion is the thermal pollution from nuclear plants. It seems odd that no one is bringing this up now. They throw off huge amounts of heat into the rivers that are used for cooling the reactors, having a dramatic impact on the local ecology, and contribute directly to warming the planet. Also, the electric cars are not emissions free either, They are just farther away from the emissions needed to create the electricity. And don't forget the pollution from manufacture and disposal of the batteries There are no silver bullets.

Posted by: Phil at 12/11/2009 11:34:47 AM

Rather than great innovations most of the eight above look like hype, more hype, and overly optimistic promises. We need a reality check here. Most of the energy produced from the above paragraphs may work but won't be cheap. We've already seen what $4 gas did to Detroit and the strain that high energy costs put on our economy. Space based power plants will fall victim to launch costs, unshielded radiation, and space junk. This doesn't even include billion dollar repair missions or the occasion solar storm. Spray on solar cells sounds great until you consider that your choice of color will be black and dissipating the heat will be a major problem during the summer months. Cracking,peeling and fading will lead to major losses in output. Converting the pounding of tires sounds good until you stop to think how well normal concrete and asphalt hold up and need constant repair. Repair costs will surely outstrip savings. I'm sure there will be many useful innovations in the future. I do hope to see inexpensive electric cars and fusion powered nuclear plants. I also hope to see great innovations in conservation without which all else will be a losing game both economically and environmentally.

Posted by: Nomen at 12/11/2009 02:45:00 PM

Seth's comment about thermal pollution is currently true but represents a huge opportunity for conservation. Waste heat represents wasted energy that could be used to heat nearby businesses. Another plus of locating other businesses nearby would be reduced electric transmission losses. One promising idea is to use the nuclear waste heat to grow oil producing algae which would capture atmospheric CO2 and produce carbon neutral biodiesel. This CO2 capture could even work for coal fired plants to reduce the overall emissions.

Posted by: Doug at 12/11/2009 10:39:39 PM

I agree with Bob and his observations about Grandpa living off the grid with the windmill, Delco batteries, cistern, well, furnace, and root cellar. My grandparents had the same conveniences in South Dakota during the 1930s as well as my mother has commented to me. Some of the things we can be doing right now to reduce our energy consumption and negative impacts on the environment can be achieved by learning from history and emmulating past practices. They may not be as convenient, but many had utility, could save each of us significant money, could reduce our consumption of energy fuels and reduce our (significantly overstated and hyped) reliance on foreign energy sources.

Posted by: Jack at 12/12/2009 05:53:13 AM

@Seth: OK, I'm as concerned about the environment as the next guy, but I have to disagree with your concern for thermal pollution by nuclear power. I'm near the Calvert Cliffs plant on the Chesapeake Bay (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvert_Cliffs_Nuclear_Power_Plant) and the warm water discharge is a boon to fishing for rockfish, as well as the lower level food chain. It's the go-to place during the winter for local anglers. Read it on Wikipedia if you don't believe me. I'm not an extremist on either side of the environment cause -- just searching for truth.

Posted by: Sue Jones at 12/14/2009 11:36:32 AM

Lots of errors in this story. For Starters the Chevy Volt will have about a 400 mile range- the first 40 on Electricity alone. Developing the Bakken Shale would release a lot more carbon than oil does- we cannot afford to do that if we want to keep our low lying cities and Florida. Spray-on-solar is a fantasy, but thin films are real (FirstSolar, Solyndra, NanoSolar) and smart concentrators are real. (SolFocus, Skyline Solar.) And large scale Solar Thermal is already economic. (eSolar) Good call on Thorium though!

Posted by: John at 12/16/2009 09:28:01 PM

2012 is almost here. Nothing else matters. Good night, sleep tight.

Posted by: Rob at 12/21/2009 10:39:18 PM

Some of these are intriguing and it will be interesting to see how they play out. But, sorry, with the shenanigans being played by the climate "scientists" at the moment, you'll have to forgive me for not buying into the AGW argument. Those folks are, after all, just people and are as motivated by greed and fame as anyone so it doesn't surprise me to see the lengths to which they are willing to go so as to keep those grant $$s flowing. The climate probably is changing to some extent, but we'd be better served by learning to deal with it than by foolishly believing we can influence it.




Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

Featured Videos From Kiplinger




facebook
twitter
RSS