The Oil Shortage Myth

Alarmism about running out of black gold is fueled by speculators and doesn't reflect the reality of available, albeit pricey, oil in coming years.

By Jim Ostroff, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

August 7, 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Warnings about running out of oil are overdone. It's a useful sound bite for proponents of so-called peak oil, who don't have the foggiest knowledge of petroleum geology. But they do have something to sell. Some oil trading fund managers, for instance, hope to spook other investors into bidding up prices, and neo-green activists advocate ending oil usage because it's "dirty" and say we'll run out soon anyway.

Doomsday forecasts are off base in two key respects:

  • Demand. High fuel prices spur consumers and businesses to cut back on consumption. They also boost purchases of more fuel efficient automobiles, which presently include as many hybrids as drivers can get their hands on.
    Rather than growing at a projected 3% this year, oil use worldwide will be up around 1%. Longer term, the planet's ballyhooed appetite for oil isn't likely to expand 3% to 5% a year, requiring oil production to balloon 50% to 130 million barrels a day by 2030. Instead, global oil consumption will be closer to 115 million barrels by that year, even with the increased use in fast growing economies such as China and India.
  • Supply. Oil prices above $75 a barrel jump-started burgeoning markets for biofuels made without any petroleum and new supplies of oil made from unconventional sources like shale oil in the U.S. and tar sands in Canada. Worldwide oil production will likely rise 10% by 2018 to nearly 97 million barrels daily, though oil will be pricey. Even as older wells in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere fade, new technologies will open production from huge reserves off Brazil's coast, which may hold 50 billion barrels of oil. And there are other finds.
    "The peak oil alarmists fail to say anything about the vast amounts of oil being found in the Gulf of Mexico now, or the major deal that Chevron just did in oil rich Angola," says John Kilduff, a senior vice president with MFGlobal, a commodities trading firm.
    New high-tech exploration also shows that Iraq's oil reserves potentially are double the Saddam Hussein-era estimates, placing the reserves second in the world behind Saudi Arabia's, Kilduff says. With other likely bonanzas to be produced from North Dakota's Bakken oil field, in the Arctic and off the U.S. and West African coasts, increases in oil supply will outpace demand in the coming years.

This doesn't mean that oil and fuels will be dirt cheap. Crude oil produced from fields miles below the ocean or in frigid, inhospitable climates costs more than sinking a well in Texas, Oklahoma or California reserves. But over time, the ramp-up of production will ease extreme price volatility and help curtail sharp price run-ups experienced the past two years.

Until the middle of this decade, there had been about a 3 million barrel a day surplus in world production that could buffer unexpected supply disruptions. The cushion evaporated in 2007, courtesy of an unanticipated surge in oil usage in China and India. A small reserve materialized this year, but it was so small that investors became even bolder about bidding up crude oil prices. And alarmist talk about peak oil grew louder.

The decline in reserves also negatively affected oil production. "Producers such as Venezuela could let production fall and nationalize the oil industry because there was no punishment for doing this when prices kept rising," says Lucian Pugliaresi, president of the Energy Policy Research Foundation.

However, that psychology has been reversed the past couple of months. With slowing demand growth restoring the cushion to 2 million barrels a day or so next year, and reduced chances that oil prices will climb endlessly, oil producing nations have a new incentive to increase production, Pugliaresi says.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (19)

Posted by: Zeke Putnam at 08/07/2008 09:52:02 AM

The bottom line is this: We haven't discovered what we burned for decades. Present discoveries are not offsetting usage either. In addition, new discoveries are harder to develop, have shorter times to peak production and, often, a steeper decline. Humans have a predictable pattern of emotions to rapid change. Right now we are in the "it can't be real" phase so every positive is magnified and every negative minimized. We grab at every idea no matter how preposterous to avoid dealing with reality. Of course there will be ups and downs in price. As price rises, consumption will decrease and, naturally, the price. But as demand increases, price will again climb. I read energy information daily. The one thing that is missing from every article is an understanding of human behavior. It's all journalists who understand writing (selling something) but not oil, economists who think something can be created from nothing if enough money is spent, people looking for a "new" idea so they can drive forever, etc, etc. I see agendas. So many times it makes me think of the Titanic. I'm sure talk of the pumps keeping up, the captain doing something, the leak isn't that big, something (one)will save us and countless other discussions took place for some time. If I've learned anything from life, it's that reality ALWAYS wins no matter how much I try to avoid it.

Posted by: Omri Schwarz at 08/07/2008 09:54:30 AM

Sheesh! One week of falling oil prices and you people are popping the champagne like we dodged the bullet. Your readiness to jump on this story is pretty telling.

Posted by: Clifford J. Wirth at 08/07/2008 09:55:09 AM

Oil production will not keep pace with global demand. We have reached maximum production and it will soon begin to decline. This is explained in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed/ located at Peak Oil Associates website.

Posted by: Joe Honick at 08/07/2008 10:23:36 AM

Isn't it just dandy to have it said openly that supplies will always be there to meet demand if those who demand exercise a little restraint to get some price action? Please excuse the language, but there is a certain whore house economics applicable here that ought to offend enough of the world to expose what's really going on. Memories are dim as to when the oil industry successfully eliminated street cars in most of America and helped to diminish the quality of railway travel and how some companies were successfully tried for anti-trust activity. We may be approaching some of this same situation today.

Posted by: Allen Fuller at 08/07/2008 12:01:41 PM

"proponents of... peak oil, who don't have the foggiest knowledge of petroleum geology." Actually, many of the peak oil proponents are oil geologists. It is investors and pundits like yourself that don't have the foggiest idea about petroleum geology. "The peak oil alarmists fail to say anything about the vast amounts of oil being found in the Gulf of Mexico now, or the major deal that Chevron just did in oil rich Angola." Peak oil "alarmists" do not ignore the new production coming online. Rather, it is the oil "cornucopians" and "pollyannas" that refuse to acknowledge _conservative_ estimates of 3-5% DECLINE in existing mature fields. (Mexico's Cantarel field for example has annual decline in the double digits.) All these "vast" new deals barely make up for the decline, which is only going to accelerate, yet they pretend that we are adding this new production on top of existing steady production that will continue forever. No, it is the "cornucopians" and "pollyannas" who are out of touch with reality. Kilduff uses words of abundance like "vast", "major deal" "oil-rich" and so on, but NEVER BOTHERS TO QUANTIFY THEM. If you put the actual figures for the "vast" new discoveries like Brazil's much-vaunted Tupi field, next to the figures for annual decline, you see that they turn out to be pretty pitiful. Tupi is estimated to produce 1 million barrels per day at its peak. At a 3-5% decline rate in existing fields, we need 3-5 Tupi fields every year JUST TO KEEP EXISTING PRODUCTION LEVELS. And Tupi is touted as being one of the largest discoveries in decades! I choose to go with the realists who are analyzing the data instead of using unquantified superlatives and ignoring the decline in existing fields. Look at the BIG picture. Figure out the numbers for yourself, and don't believe the hype. It's not that hard to do the numbers. It's time to leave oil behind. It's time to move to alternatives. No, it's actually past time, but we don't have the chance to change the past, only our future. Let's get started.

Posted by: sean at 08/07/2008 12:38:21 PM

Since the author is such an "expert" on petroleum geology, perhaps he can explain the concept of "depletion". Hint: Even at a conservative 4% depletion rate the world needs to produce a new Saudi Arabia's worth of oil every 2 years. And please get back to us when that shale oil facility gets into production.

Posted by: John Killisir at 08/08/2008 12:34:18 PM

Technology will solve the problem. THe nano-micro-super carbon nanowires together with dextro-3-4-polimerasas will produce energy to feed all our cars, revert global warming and make population growth sustainable. The problem is in all those peak oil alarmists who believe in the first law of thermodynamics! Such a group of un-scientist! Everybody knows we can extract energy from nowhere, resources are infinite, the Earth is flat and the Sun is an Earth's satellite.

Posted by: Mauricio Babilonia at 08/08/2008 01:37:10 PM

I find I must agree with the spirit of the other comments that the age of inexpensive, readily-available petroleum is coming to an end. This of course means that the ages of Obstinate Denial and Snake Oil Solutions have only just begun. Also, oil shale has always been the fuel of the future—and always will be.

Posted by: Steve at 08/08/2008 03:39:26 PM

Agreed, politics and ideology aside- you look scientifically at realistic resources from ANWR, offshore US/Gulf, Brazil, Arctic, Bakken, Iraq to name a few- we've just begun tapping oil. Much of the Malthusian looking stats come from the fact we've had 20-odd years of very low prices- hence not a lot of new investment etc. That's changing as we speak- of course every new oil well is a little more hassle than the last- that has held true from the first wells drilled in Texas- you get the easiest stuff first. Meanwhile the price has never trended higher- only spiked- Good time to shop for a nice SUV!

Posted by: Brad at 08/08/2008 05:22:45 PM

This article is laughable. I'd like to invite him for a ride in my electric car.

Posted by: Ian McDowell at 08/09/2008 12:09:12 AM

Peak oil is simply the moment in time when conventional oil supply is unable to keep up with demand. This event occurred about the time that the long term average price of oil (previously around $20) disappeared as a nice memory. Evidence would suggest that this event occurred around the same time as 911.

Posted by: Gale Whitaker at 08/09/2008 01:42:54 AM

Jim - You are the one who doesn't know what he is talking about. Peak oil has nothing to do with geology, it has to do with statistics. It has NOTHING to do with how much oil there is on the earth. The earth will NEVER run out of oil. Peak oil only has to do with "production rate". If the rate of production can't keep up with the demand the market will force the price to skyrocket. Eventually this trend will result in shortages which will be disastrous. Twenty of the largest oil fields are experiencing production rate reduction. These rate reductions have many different causes but the reasons don't matter, the result is "peak oil". In addition to production rate reductions there is the matter of billions of Chinese and Indians who are buying subsidized gasoline for their new cars and taking a Sunday drive. This will insure that demand increases forever. The Republicans are screaming drill, drill, drill. One problem is that all the worlds drill rigs are currently in use. The cost of building new rigs is skyrocketing because of the higher prices of diesel. These higher prices for rigs must be amortized by charging more for the oil that is eventually produced. And so it goes.

Posted by: J. Greig at 08/09/2008 03:24:33 AM

You scoff at the "Peak Oil Alarmist", but your story ignores the reality of the situation as well. Yes, new oil is coming online. As is new demand form India and China who will far outstrip current world demand within 10 years. They have 2+ Billion of our worlds people. Many of those people are just now obtaining electricity and cars. If their economies keep booming, every Chinese person could be consuming as much crude oil annually as an average American. Now won't that be a pickle. Why don't you try putting your crayon to your coloring book and do some real arithmetic and then tell us that oil production will keep up with demand.

Posted by: Matt Purintun at 08/09/2008 08:55:45 PM

"And please get back to us when that shale oil facility gets into production." Last time I checked North Dakota's Bakken Shale was producing quite well with the US Geological service claiming there are 4.3 Billion barrels of recoverable oil. Marathon just had an article in Barons about it, and because of the oil shale North Dakota has jumped into 7th in oil drilling based on Baker Hughes ranking. Just thought I would get back to you with that information Sean you can Google the Bakken formation.

Posted by: Gumby at 08/10/2008 03:42:22 AM

Oil conservation is the largest untapped reserve totaling unknown billions of barrels to 2050. Yeah, I know there is no drop of oil in conservation but it is no different to drilling for new oil. Every barrel of oil you conserve is equal to every barrel of oil you drill. Conservation is the biggest oil reserve topping Saudi Arabia and Iraq combined. America will have to conserve the biggest share of the conservation reserve out of thin air. it is a fact! Nobody likes to tell you to stay home instead of driving. This is what it takes to conserve oil.

Posted by: bert at 08/10/2008 04:25:55 AM

We do need an approach that is not alarmist to wean ourselves from foreign oil dependency. Foreign oil runs up our already staggering trade deficit and weakens our dollar and our economy. We need to keep the energy dollars and jobs here. Many producers of foreign oil are not our friends, why send money to them and enable their bad behaviors? A common sense approach to conservation and domestic production is needed here to get past the alarmist predictions in an election year.

Posted by: Robert I Spengler at 08/14/2008 09:26:36 PM

You folks are suppose to be our source of good balanced and factual information. If so then this article should have taken into account the political and global Muslim religious conflict and threats to our way of life and implications of continuing to depend on oil out of the middle East. Maybe the dollar cost will not sky rocket but the social and indirect cost of funding the conflict with fundamentalist Muslims will. Now is the time to move away from any reliance on the middle East oil and sink our dollars into finding other ways of providing our energy needs from within our economy and limits of control. Current history is showing us what happens when we are dependent on other less stable countries for our basic resources.

Posted by: David at 08/17/2008 02:35:36 AM

It is comforting to know that we will never run out of oil.

Posted by: thurman marcum at 08/18/2009 12:44:22 PM

This oil shortage fraud is a myth.T his thing started in the sixties. When that didn't work they started the global warming farce. We got the most abundant resource of them all, water It can easily be converted into hydrogen. This can powered cars, planes and trains. We should stop belly aching and start looking to the future. Amerca wake up. August 17,2009 Thurman

Today's Video More Videos >>

Extra Cash for the Holidays

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement