Cash in Hand

Don't Overlook Ginnie Maes

These U.S. guaranteed securities have held up well despite the financial meltdown and have better yields than Treasuries.

By Jeffrey R. Kosnett, Senior Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance

May 22, 2009
Text Size T T

Advertisement

It's not happening yet, but massive borrowing will inevitably boost long-term interest rates and hammer the market value of Treasury bonds. At the same time, I understand why you like federal guarantees. This presents an unpleasant choice: Hold onto Treasuries that are in peril of losing significant market value, or move to edgier neighborhoods of the bond marketplace. BBB-rated and junk corporate bonds pay unusually high yields now relative to the Treasury. Emerging markets bond funds are having a good run. But I cannot recommend you take more than a token position to junk and foreign bonds if you're managing irreplaceable savings.

RELATED LINKS
Where to Find Top Yields
A Dividend ETF Disappoints
Investments That Pay You Every Month

Ideally, you want something that has the government's backing that pays more than 3.2% for ten years or 4.1% for 30, the current yields on Treasury debt. You can buy a ten-year FDIC-insured CD from Charles Schwab that pays interest monthly but still earn just 3.85%. At that rate you may as well feed an online savings account for 2% or so and wait for CDs to pay better as the economy recovers and banks bid up for deposits.

However, there's one other, often overlooked, U.S. guaranteed alternative, Ginnie Maes. It sounds crazy to praise mortgage-related investments so soon after mortgage derivatives incinerated Wall Street and the world economy, but the Ginnie Mae brand is different.

GNMA, formally known as Government National Mortgage Association, isn't a direct lender or a for-profit financial firm. It is an agency within the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development that unlike Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac never was a stockholder-owned corporation whose managers had any incentive to inflate earnings to try to pump the stock price. Ginnie simply stamps Uncle Sam's full faith and credit on pools of conservative privately-issued home loans.

Since the start of what we call the financial meltdown last year, GNMA securities have stood firm. From mid-September through May 20, the popular Vanguard GNMA fund (symbol VFIIX), the category's largest, has returned 6%, to 4% for Vanguard's broad bond market index ETF and even less for some other ostensibly non-mortgage-related investments. Monthly cash distributions are off slightly the last couple of months, but net asset value per share is up from $10.31 to $10.70, quite a leap in this kind of fund over a short an interval.

This isn't due to any unique trading wizardry. Other GNMA funds, such as those from BlackRock and Payden, did as well or better. American Century's and Fidelity's GNMA funds virtually equaled Vanguard. The Dreyfus GNMA fund can invest up to 20% in credit card receivables and non-government-guaranteed mortgage securities, so it's one of the category's laggards. But it still is ahead since Lehman Brothers vanished.

Clearly, this is a superb showing in challenging times. GNMA funds did get some help from the red tape and scarce credit that's made it hard for homeowners to refinance mortgages at lower rates. Refis are a headache for investors in mortgage pools because lower-paying loans replace higher-paying ones.

Your best environment is for rates to hold fairly steady. Rising rates will erode some principal, but even there, you get a break. If mortgage rates climb, and they should if long-term Treasury rates do, many of the 6% loans you find in current GNMA portfolios will stick. They won't refi, but they also won't default. Ginnie isn't a party to questionable adjustable-rate or interest-only or jumbo mortgages. Most of its guarantees are on modest-sized loans under low-risk programs like the Veterans Administration.

I asked a broker for some current quotes on individual GNMA securities. You need $25,000, so here's one area of bonds where I prefer funds with no reservations -- and besides, when rates are rising, funds have a buffer of some older higher-rate pools. The broker said business is slow in individual Ginnies because the strong performance has narrowed the spread between GNMA yields and Treasury yields.

But the mortgages still do pay better. A newly-issued GNMA pool in April was priced to yield an estimated 3.8% on the assumption that half of the loans would be refinanced or paid off in three years. A three-year Treasury, and I know that's not a precise comparison because mortgages are supposed to last 30 years, pays 1.3%. That's still scanty. But 3.8% for a while is good enough for full faith and credit.

Discuss

Reader Comments (5)

Posted by: mattkodak at 05/22/2009 01:35:33 PM

Years ago, i invested in Fidelity's GNMA mutual fund as one of my IRA choices and it has paid continuous dividends while at the same time increasing in principal NAV so for my money, it was a good investment and continues growing even during this current down market for stocks. My portfolio consists mainly of bonds in mutual balanced funds as well as complete bond-only funds. As a retiree i sought a more conservative blend of assets and as a result sleep well each night after viewing the daily market results. There's a lot to be said for investing in fixed income securities.

Posted by: Roy at 05/26/2009 08:31:59 PM

I'm still 20 years away from full retirement, but 2 1/2 years ago I got nervous about rising energy prices and increased daily volatility of the stock market and got more conservative myself by switching the majority of my wife and my portfolio's to balanced(60/40) mutual funds along with a few other fixed income funds which will eventually be switched to the balanced funds. Still sporting an overall lose for the previous 52 weeks, but only -12.6%. YTD or portfolio is up 9.5%. I'm sleeping better at night myself. I think its about time more people stop listening to the 'experts' who suggest we should be 80-100% in stocks...which by the way, earn higher management fees than bonds. Coincidence..I don't think so.

Posted by: A Christie at 06/05/2009 01:07:29 AM

Amen. When I sold our home last year, I needed a safe place to put my $100k where I knew the principal would not erode yet provide me some inflation protection and a generally "safe" place for a year or so. A retired economics professor pointed me to GNMA funds, Vanguard's in particular. As the market melted down last Oct/Nov, I kept checking the NAV and dividend reinvestment numbers and eventually was able to sleep very well as this fund generated a stellar (compared to the market) 3.2% return. The rising rates will only serve to reinforce my decision to put more of my IRA contributions in this vehicle and I am still 15 years from retirement.

Posted by: Charles Cicco at 06/17/2009 04:24:44 PM

Contrary to what the “experts” say, stock market returns are overrated relative to safe compound interest bearing investments. Over the first decade of the 21st century the composite return on U.S. stocks is likely to be negative (S. Hanke, “Unconventional Wisdom”, Forbes, March 16, 2009). Every time a bubble bursts, 401k savings in stocks evaporate resulting in diminished retirement options. The stock market is essentially a gambling casino; the house always profits. The only available options for retirement savings (401k, IRA, etc.) should be risk free treasury securities, ginnie maes and FDIC insured funds. I especially like ginnie mae funds like Vanguard GNMA which outperformed the S&P 500 over the last 10 years. Indeed, retirement savings should never be subjected to the risk inherent in the stock market. Let Retirement Funds benefit workers, not Wall Street...

Posted by: Pat at 08/20/2009 12:04:12 PM

There has been talk of a potential GNMA bubble... and also issues of repricing on mortgages which would affect the price-yield ratio... I want to park some CDs coming due somewhere! Some of the so-called high rate accounts drop their rates and the most one can get is a bit over 2% now with a so-so Bankrate rating. I am still looking to GNMA to park cash and in fact have the Vanguard GNMA for SEP and non-SEP. But what about the "bubble" and price-yield concerns? Thanks. Pat

Today's Video More Videos >>

Turning Allowances Into Savings

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement