Give a Gift

Stock Watch

8 Dirt-Cheap Stocks with Great Potential

These companies may be down on their luck, but mountains of cash prime them for a turnaround.

By Elizabeth Ody, Associate Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance

February 25, 2010
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Ask a Question
  • Advertisement

What’s better than a bunch of dirt-cheap stocks? A bunch of dirt-cheap stocks of companies stuffed to the brim with cash. Cash-rich companies can jump on new opportunities more easily than cash-poor firms can. And in the case of riskier, less financially fit firms such as the ones below, cash buys breathing room. It means they have time to work through short-term issues and get their houses in order. Each of these eight companies trades for less than $5 per share, but don’t let that mislead you into thinking they’re penny stocks -- each runs a substantial, mature business. And if animal spirits return to the market their stocks have plenty of room to run.

For Qwest Communications (symbol Q), a $2.4-billion pile of the green stuff, or $1.39 per share, is a lifeline while waiting for a takeover. One of the original “Baby Bells” spun off from the old AT&T in 1984, Qwest’s trouble is that “it’s basically a land-line phone company,” says George Putnam, editor of The Turnaround Letter, which ran the screen that generated the names in this story.

Related Links


Qwest’s business has been in decline as cell-phone-toting customers dump their traditional phones. “Its business is like a slowly melting ice cube,” Putnam says. But he thinks the company, which generates $2 billion in annual sales and throws off about $3 billion in cash flow from its core business each year, can sustain its 32-cent-per-share annual dividend until a buyer turns up. At $4.45 a share, the stock yields a hefty 7.3% and trades for 13 times estimated 2010 profits per share of $0.33 (all share prices and related ratios are as of the February 23 close). Cash accounts for 31% of the D enver firm’s $7.8 billion market capitalization.

Square-shaped burgers, roast beef sandwiches and curly fries aren’t in long-term decline, but fast-food outlets such as Wendy’s/Arby’s Group (WEN) still have plenty of problems. Think of the last time you were in a fast-food restaurant. Was there a $1 menu? That kind of aggressive discounting cuts profits for restaurateurs who have to match rivals’ prices while coping with volatile commodity costs.

Wendy’s has struggled since 2002, when its lovable founder, Dave Thomas, passed away. In 2008, Arby’s owner at the time -- Triarc Companies, a holding company controlled by billionaire Nelson Peltz, who has a history of executing smart food-industry acquisitions and turnarounds -- acquired Wendy’s. So far, the company is on track for meeting its ambitious cost-cutting and efficiency targets, including boosting Wendy’s operating margins by five percentage points by the end of 2011 and slashing general and administrative costs. Peltz and partner Peter May together control about 22% of the joined company, which likely did about $3.6 billion in sales in 2009. At $4.87, Wendy’s/Arby’s trades for 23 times the $0.21 per share that analysts expect it to earn in 2010. Cash on the books, at $645 million, makes up more than one quarter of the firm’s $2.3 billion market capitalization.

It’s no accident that power-generator Dynegy Inc. (DYN) is sitting on $705 million, or $0.83 per share, in cash. Management has lately been selling assets in order to reduce debt and improve financial flexibility. Debt levels have been hovering at near-unmanageable levels for years, and some investors are still concerned that Dynegy could violate the terms on some of its loans.

Dynegy sells the power generated by its natural-gas and coal plants into the unregulated energy market. It’s a volatile business -- Dynegy is at the mercy of commodity prices, power prices and the weather, all of which can lead to unpredictable earnings and cash flows. But building new plants is a costly and laborious process, so long-term price trends will probably help Dynegy, as long as it can stay on top of its debt issues. Analysts expect Dynegy to lose money in 2010 . But at $1.65, the stock trades for just 0.38 times book value. And because cash accounts for half of Dynegy’s market capitalization, it’s as though investors are getting all of the firm’s assets, including its 20 power plants, for about $700 million.

Five more names for your consideration:

Alcatel-Lucent (ALU; $2.98)
What to love: The company’s broad range of telecommunications gear and global sales footprint. At $2.34 per-share, cash accounts for about 80% of the share price.

What to watch: Negative cash flow is gradually burning up the firm’s safety net.

E*Trade Financial (ETFC; $1.55)
What to love: A strong brokerage franchise and a 0.78 price-to-book-value ratio. The firm’s $5 billion of cash on the books could pay off its debt load in full.

What to watch: The company is still in the process of unwinding a disastrous venture into the mortgage business.

Internet Initiative Japan (IIJI; $4.61)
What to love: In Japan, as in the rest of the world, people are sending more data across the Internet and continually need to upgrade their Internet-access and networking gear. Cash-per-share of $1.25 accounts for more than one quarter of the share price.

What to watch: The company is a small fish in its market.

Sprint Nextel (S; $3.49)
What to love: A growing business in prepaid cell phones could attract a buyer to the company. Cash-per-share of $2.07 accounts for nearly 60% of the share price.

What to watch: Although the firm has nearly $4 billion on hand to pay the bills, it also has $21 billion in long-term debt.

Novell (NOVL; $4.84)
What to love: Cash accounts for 59% of the firm’s market cap and Novell carries no debt, so investors can essentially buy its proprietary software business and Linux operating system for about $700 million.

What to watch: Novell’s resources can hardly compare with those of competitors IBM and Microsoft.



DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (15)

Posted by: Greg at 03/02/2010 01:20:04 AM

Qwest has to be one of the worst suggestions. It is like AOL at its height before changes to the market. Qwest is about to take some drastic hits as more people switch from dsl. Everywhere more and more towns are going to broadband and fiber optics and consumers will follow. DSL is a dying breed and with it Qwest will be split in half

Posted by: james at 03/02/2010 11:39:27 PM

...how would I get started investing in some of the stocks mention in your article? I am new in the investment field. your response will be of great help ..thanks...james kennedy. and how much money would I need to get started?

Posted by: Elizabeth Ody at 03/04/2010 10:31:02 AM

Hi James. This is Elizabeth Oday, author of this column. If you're new to investing you should consider building a core portfolio first (which, with ETFs and/or low-minimum funds you can easily do with only a few hundred dollars), before investing in riskier stocks such as these. Shoot me an email at Eody@kiplinger.com and I'll send you links to some of our past articles that I think would help you.

Posted by: RWG at 03/05/2010 08:24:25 PM

I cannot believe that Kiplinger publishes an article like this. Money is not made in the stock market by buying cheap stocks, it is made by owning stocks that are growing earnings, are well-managed and have momentum. Those criteria do not apply to these stocks, in fact for the most part these stocks are precisely the opposite of those criteria. Kiplinger should be ashamed.

Posted by: yoyomama at 03/07/2010 03:43:49 PM

>>>E*Trade Financial (ETFC; $1.55) What to love: A strong brokerage franchise and a 0.78 price-to-book-value ratio. The firms $5 billion of cash on the books could pay off its debt load in full.

Posted by: Stanley J. Mesaros at 03/10/2010 04:44:23 PM

Need Stock symbol of a Small Master Limited Partnership($1 Billion)that Yields about 10% annually.

Posted by: Bobby at 03/29/2010 12:04:39 PM

This is the second article by this same writer on money advice...first one on investing via an online middle man to purchase load mutual funds was bad enough; however, this one is worse. Quest Communications?? Sprint??? Maybe these will go the same way as Cramer recommending Rite Aid and Blockbuster at $6.40 and subsequently are penny stocks now. Focus should be on fundamentals and management, not speculative potential. The stocks in this article are awful recommendations and have no true potential.

Posted by: Roger at 04/14/2010 02:06:57 AM

How do you know that DYN has $700M in cash? When I look at all of the available on line info, I never see that number. Stock price is now at $1.22, with 600M shares outstanding, making it worth essentially the cash in hand. (600M x $1.22=$732M). How can a power generating company be worth only the cash it has in the bank? How do you interpret the 2009 financial statement? It shows a loss of over $1B, highly unusual compared to previous years.

Posted by: cathy at 05/04/2010 12:52:30 PM

didn't qwest just sell? and sprint has been the same price forever. RWG is right, you need a stock that is going to grow a few bucks a year. and sorry to say, you may have missed that boat already.

Posted by: Bud at 05/28/2010 10:47:29 PM

I love reading the comments from all these smug losers. If any of us had been so lucky to have bought a portfolio of these picks, we'd be up on the year and likely would have a winner for some time to come! Way to go Ody!

Posted by: Roger at 05/31/2010 11:00:55 AM

I thought to take a look and back test the recommendations from Feb 25 to May 30. Of the 7 recommendations, 4 have outperformed the S&P and 3 have underperformed. Unfortunately for me, I chose the WORST performer of the bunch, DYN. Sold before the worst of the damage. spring was a clear winner, up 60% However, it had bought ALL of the stocks equally, I'd be up about 15%, compared to an essentially flat benchmark. Buy low, sell high

Posted by: Al Jirik at 06/02/2010 01:56:11 PM

Your opinion on Amerilithium (AMEL). Ford,GM, BMW,Mereches Benz surge toward battery powered hybrids, Comment welcomed! Thank You.

Posted by: john rack at 08/22/2010 06:10:15 AM

with new internet ventures GROUPON.com and the like gaining niche in the cyber space one can rather invest in such stocks when offered instead going for the traditional players like sprint, novell which are competing with (the) like(s) (of) microsoft,at&t respectively. (Are) the bargain picks better or the value picks? value picks are more safe.

Posted by: brett at 09/13/2010 11:35:59 PM

It seems to me that investing in Qwest right now would be just about as good as wadding up your money, burning it, and dancing in a circle singing Kumbaya...anyone that's actually still invested (in Qwest) should sell what they have and take a loss, and avoid an even bigger one.

Posted by: kenyattawoods at 09/29/2010 08:15:00 PM

How could I start investing and what dollar amount on less expensive share. I am not rich




Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

Featured Videos From Kiplinger




facebook
twitter
RSS