Making Your Money Last

Treasury to Seniors: Drop Dead

IRA owners must act quickly to take required 2008 payouts.

By Joan Pryde, Senior Tax Editor, the Kiplinger letters

Kevin McCormally, Editorial Director, Kiplinger.com

December 18, 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

The Treasury Department decided Thursday not to grant relief in 2008 from rules that require Americans 70 1/2 and older to take minimum annual withdrawals from their IRAs, 401(k)s or other retirement plans. The disappointing decision led some of those affected to recall the famous 1975 New York Daily News headline "FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD," after President Gerald Ford opposed efforts for a federal bailout of New York City.

For months, there's been talk of some sort of break for seniors whose retirement accounts have been battered by the severe stock-market meltdown. Why force seniors who don't need the money to withdraw money from already depleted nest eggs? During the presidential campaign, both Barack Obama and John McCain backed relief. And, earlier this month, Congress passed legislation waiving required payouts in 2009.

Those facts, plus hints from the Treasury (which oversees the IRS) that some sort of relief would soon be granted, led many senior citizens to postpone taking their required minimum distributions (RMDs). But Treasury decided Thursday that it does not have the authority to waive payouts and that any relief short of that -- such as allowing a smaller sum to be taken -- would be complicated and confusing, and would not be fair to seniors who already had taken their RMDs for the year.

So, if you've been delaying a withdrawal, delay no more.

Contact your IRA or 401(k) sponsor as soon as possible to request the payment. (If you have parents or grandparents who may be affected by this decision, make sure they know about it.)

If you have more than one IRA, your RMD for 2008 is based on the total balance of all of your IRAs as of December 31, 2007, but you can take the money from any one or combination of the accounts. If you have more than one 401(k), a minimum amount must come out of each plan.

Failure to withdraw the minimum amount by December 31 will trigger one of the most vicious penalties in the tax law: The IRS will claim 50% of the amount you should have withdrawn.

There is one exception to the December 31 deadline -- for those who reached age 70 1/2 during 2008. Because this will be their first RMD, they can delay it to as late as April 1, 2009. Doing so normally requires an account holder to withdraw -- and pay tax on -- two years' worth of distributions in a single year, because the second-year payout would be due by December 31, 2009. And that could push you into a higher tax bracket. But that won't be a worry in 2009, since Congress has waived the RMD rule for the year.

Discuss

Reader Comments (15)

Posted by: J.Panzella at 12/19/2008 12:04:48 PM

What is the min % required to withdraw from an IRA for a 72 year old?

Posted by: Bill at 12/19/2008 02:42:30 PM

Sounds like it was just too complicated for Congress, the Treasury, and the IRS to figure out. What else is new.

Posted by: kevin at 12/19/2008 07:09:00 PM

Hi, this is Kevin McCormally at Kiplinger for J.Panzella. In the year you're 72, the RMD is 3.90625% of the 12/31/07 balance. The life expectancy factors can be found on page 104 of IRS Publication 590. Hope this helps.

Posted by: Brian Hill at 12/20/2008 09:54:34 AM

This didn't make any sence for the following reasons: 1) seniors shouldn't have 100% of their money on stocks at age 70 1/2 so they can draw form the bond/cash side for RMD 2)Even if they withdraw from the stock side they can pay taxes and buy the same stock/fund in a taxable account. 3) The only reason seniors want this exemption is to avoid paying taxes - guess you can't blame them for trying.

Posted by: L.Keavey at 12/20/2008 06:02:06 PM

Theoretically, if your IRA was worth $100,000( invested in blue chips like GM, AIG et al) at the end of 2007 and you lost it all due to the market bust, you would still be required to withdraw $4-5,000. Exactly how do you make a mandatory withdrawal from an account with lttle or no remaining assets?

Posted by: C.L. Waltemath at 12/21/2008 10:51:49 AM

Has Bush signed the action on the 2009 RMD?

Posted by: kevin at 12/22/2008 09:38:37 PM

Hi, this is Kevin McCormally of Kiplinger with an answer for C.L. Waltemath. The bill was presented to the President on December 17 and, as of today, Mr. Bush has not signed it. Not to worry though; he has said he will sign the bill into law. You can count on a waiver of the RMD rules for 2009.

Posted by: MARTIN CAULEY at 12/23/2008 03:42:23 PM

WHY NOT LET US RETURN A PORTION OF THE RMD TO OUR IRA ACCOUNT?

Posted by: David at 12/24/2008 12:37:21 AM

One reason for not making it applicable to 2008 is that so many seniors have already taken the RMD prior to this bill be initiated. It would have been unfair to allow a small group of late in the year filers to benefit. Furthermore, it would create an environment where seniors would wait in future years to the last minute hoping another waiver might take place. This would result in sheer processing overload for the IRA custodians.

Posted by: LW at 12/24/2008 03:11:40 AM

Kevin: The last paragraph of the article...Does that mean that a person who does not have to take a first distribution untill April 1, 2009 gets to skip both distributions that would normally occur for that year?

Posted by: Larry Beattie at 12/29/2008 02:00:24 PM

I took more than enough distributions on a monthly basis over the year. How is this reported to the IRS?

Posted by: Gregg at 12/31/2008 02:37:10 PM

REL Larry Beattie's question, distributions from your plan will be reported to you (and IRS) on form 1099-R which you will receive by end of Jan '09. Hope this helps. GH

Posted by: Gregg at 12/31/2008 02:41:14 PM

RE: the waiver of RMD's for 2009, a friend who inherited an IRA from her mother in 2004 was planning to take a distribution in full in 2009 under the 5-year rule. It appears the RMD waiver for 2009 will allow her to delay taking the full distribution until 2010 (or better yet, spreading it out over 2009 and 2010. Anyone able to comment on this? Thx!

Posted by: Al at 01/01/2009 05:34:06 PM

Congress waived the RMD rule for 2009. Does that mean two withdrawals (for the waived 2009 and for 2010) must be made in 2010?

Posted by: Jim Short at 01/24/2009 10:08:15 AM

Does the 2009 rmd waiver apply to SEPP from IRAs?

Today's Video More Videos >>

Save Money in February

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement