YOUR MONEY
CREDIT, COLLEGE, TAXES AND REAL ESTATE
PRINT
EMAIL
DEL.ICIO.US
DIGG THIS
Michael Bell is a young lawyer on the fast track. He has maxed out annual contributions to his 401(k) over the past four years. Now he faces a choice: Should he continue to contribute to his traditional 401(k) -- which saves him more than $5,000 a year in state and federal taxes -- or should he switch to a Roth 401(k), which offers no upfront tax breaks but promises tax-free income in retirement?
SECURE YOUR RETIREMENT | |||
 |
Conquer Your Fear of Investing | ||
|
|
Turn Savings Into Retirement Income | ||
|
|
TOOL: How Much Will My 401(k) Grow? | ||
|
|
FREE RETIREMENT PLANNING ADVICE | ||
Bell, who works for a law firm in Washington, D.C., wants to make sure his retirement account is as large as possible and hesitates to give up the current tax break. "But there's a good possibility that tax rates will increase in the future," he says. "Maybe the Roth 401(k) is a more appropriate approach."
Tax hedge. James Lange, a CPA and attorney in Pittsburgh, agrees that Bell, 34, is a good candidate for a Roth 401(k). "If he is going to be in the same tax bracket or higher when he retires, which is quite likely, the Roth 401(k) is the best way to go," says Lange, author of Retire Secure (Wiley, $24.95; www.paytaxeslater.com). Even if tax rates are slightly lower when Bell retires in 30 years, the Roth 401(k) would still be a better choice because of the potential for three decades of tax-free earnings, says Lange. In a traditional 401(k), your earnings also grow unfettered by taxes, but all of your withdrawals (including your earnings) are taxed at your ordinary income-tax rate.
Just as investors should diversify their retirement assets across a broad class of stocks and bonds, they should also diversify their future tax liability by holding both traditional and Roth retirement accounts, says Stephen Utkus, director of Vanguard's Center for Retirement Research. A Roth 401(k) "is an excellent hedge against possible tax hikes," says Utkus.
Thanks to his early and aggressive start on saving, Bell already has more than $80,000 in his traditional 401(k). Assuming that money earns an average of 8% per year, the account would be worth more than $800,000 in 30 years, even if he never adds another dime. Diverting some or all of his future contributions to a Roth 401(k) would help him diversify his tax liability.
Bounty of benefits. Because Roth 401(k) contributions are not tax-deductible, choosing a Roth would reduce Bell's take-home pay by about $5,000 a year. But if he can absorb the tax hit now, he'll be able to spend more after-tax income in retirement.
The Roth 401(k) is an even better deal than the more familiar Roth IRA because you can contribute more each year and there are no income-eligibility limits. This year you can contribute up to $5,000 to a Roth IRA ($6,000 if you are 50 or older) as long as your income doesn't exceed $169,000 if you are married filing jointly ($116,000 for single filers). But if your employer offers a Roth 401(k), you can contribute up to $15,500 ($20,500 for workers 50 and older), regardless of income.
Roth accounts are superior to traditional retirement plans in a couple of other ways as well. Although a Roth 401(k) requires annual distributions once you reach age 70, you can easily roll over the account to a Roth IRA, which has no distribution requirements. And you can leave a Roth account to your heirs tax-free.
Despite their advantages, Roth accounts are not right for everyone. Middle-aged workers who get a late start on retirement savings are unlikely to be in a higher tax bracket in retirement. As a result, they may be better off sticking with a traditional 401(k) and claiming a bigger tax break now, says Lange.
More Retirement Planning Advice
POSTED BY: Joe Blow (March 28, 2008 12:03 AM)
First, contribute to a 401k up to the point at which your employer stops matching it. Second, contribute the maximum you can to a Roth IRA. And lastly, if you've got anything left to contribute for that tax year, max out the rest of your 401k. This is the best way to maximize your contributions and minimize your tax hit.
POSTED BY: David Dodson (March 31, 2008 10:14 AM)
Your normal 401(k) is deductible now at your marginal rate, but your Roth 401(k) distributions at retirement will be taxed at your average rate. Since some income is not taxed, some is taxed at 10%, some at 15%, etc., you should not pay taxes at your marginal rate now in order to fund income that will be taxed at a lower rate in retirement....
POSTED BY: Todd Hanover (April 04, 2008 03:12 PM)
I'm not sure that I agree with this article for the particular person described in it (for others at lower income levels, it probably makes sense to have tax diversification). Because both traditional and Roth 401(k) contributions grow tax free, the only consideration should be whether you believe you are going to be at a higher tax rate in retirement. If your retirement tax rate is going to be lower, then you should take the tax deductions now (i.e., invest in the Traditional 401(k)) and invest those current "tax savings" elsewhere. Assuming this laywer is making $200k+ now, to be taxed higher at retirement, he would have to believe that he will be taking taxable distributions from retirement accounts of $200k+ per year (assuming tax rates stay the same, if you think they're going higher, then adjust accordingly). If you follow the goofy made-up 4% drawdown rule (i.e., "take 4% of your assets out each year in retirement"), you would need north of $5 million in your 401(k) and other taxable-at-distribution retirement accounts to reach a $200k a year distribution...
Reprint Article
|
|
|
|
|
