Give a Gift

Stocks & Bonds

Our Man Goes Undercover and Tells All

He spent days sitting through free seminars to become a super trader. Lesson number one: It’ll cost you.

By Thomas M. Anderson, Contributing Editor

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, March 2010
Text Size T T
  • Comments
  • Print This Article
  • Order a Reprint
  • Advertisement

Admit it: You’ve been tempted. You’ve seen the infomercials for trading systems that will teach you how to master the markets. Sign up for a free seminar in your area and you’re on your way to wealth and freedom. Ordinary people just like you are earning thousands each month. Why not join the club?

With visions of early retirement dancing in my head, I decided to take the plunge, or at least the initial part of it. I would attend the free seminars of three big trading-education outfits: Online Trading Academy, BetterTrades and Profit Strategies. I wanted to see whether these outfits delivered on their promises to help people become successful traders. Here’s what I found.

Related Links


“Respect your capital”

The first rule you learn at the Online Trading Academy (OTA) is not to trust Wall Street with your money. “Wall Street has trained us to be buy-and-hold investors,” the instructor, Chris, told me and the two other students attending the Power Trading Workshop at the company’s offices in Vienna, Va., a suburb of Washington, D.C. (OTA also has offices in the United Kingdom, Singapore and Dubai, as well as in 29 other cities in the U.S. and Canada.) This is a bad thing, Chris said, because the market goes up, down and sideways. And when it heads south, as it did during the 2007-09 bear market, buy-and-hold investors get crushed. OTA’s mission was to teach the likes of me how to make money regardless of what the market does.

How, you ask? Through the power of technical analysis. Technical analysts study past data -- primarily a security’s price and trading volume -- to predict the future. They look for patterns to find reliable signals of when to buy or sell financial instruments, such as stocks, options, futures and foreign currencies. The process involves studying a menagerie of indicators, such as candlestick charts, Bollinger bands and something called the stochastic oscillator. Technicians care little, if at all, about fundamental analysis -- the examination of, say, a company’s earnings and balance sheet or of general economic conditions.

Technical analysis has both passionate critics and ardent adherents. For example, an October 2009 study by New Zealand’s Massey University found that of more than 5,000 strategies that employ technical analysis, none produced returns in the 49 countries where researchers tested the strategies beyond what you’d expect by chance. However, scores of traders, including billionaire Paul Tudor Jones, say the discipline helped them amass great fortunes. So I tried to keep an open mind.

But a debate about technical analysis was not part of the program at OTA. Instead, the seminar quickly evolved from a round of Wall Street bashing to a pitch to enroll in the company’s $4,990 Pro-Trader class. The seven-day course would show “how to treat your capital with respect,” Chris said. He added that some of the academy’s students had doubled their money in three months after taking the Pro-Trader class. Once I paid tuition, I could retake the course as often as I wanted. And if I used one of the six discount brokers that partnered with OTA, I would earn rebates on commissions up to the cost of the classes I took.

Overall, I left my free OTA seminar less than satisfied. I wanted to learn how to trade and all I got was a sales pitch. It was time to hit the road.

“Who likes money?”

I drove to the Hilton Airport Hotel in Norfolk, Va., to attend the Financial Freedom Expo, sponsored by BetterTrades. About 30 would-be zillionaires, mostly baby-boomers, sat in a cavernous ballroom. Men outnumbered women two to one.

BetterTrades’ presentation was the most lavish of the three seminars I attended. At the front of the room a large projection screen was draped in velvety purple curtains. Tables displaying neat rows of BetterTrades DVD box sets surrounded the screen. I felt like a contestant on The Price Is Right, especially after I met the expo leader, Steve, who was tall, tan and likable -- just like the game show’s Bob Barker. Steve fired up the crowd with questions such as “Who likes money?” and “Who would like to make more?”

For Steve, successful trading was a matter of identifying support and resistance levels for a security. Look at a stock chart. If you draw a line that hits multiple points where the stock price bounces back from a low point, it is known as a support level. The line drawn on the chart that hits multiple points where the price peaks is known as a resistance level. Under technical analysis, a stock trader wants to buy at support (low) and sell at resistance (high). Sounds easy, but it’s difficult to know where the support and resistance levels are until after the fact.

With the class wrapping up, Steve had a special offer for me. For just $3,995, if I acted now, I could attend the two-day Market Essentials seminar coming to Norfolk. The first five people to sign up would get free bonus training materials. Steve said I had nothing to lose because if BetterTrades’ strategies did not earn me three times what I spent on tuition within six months, the company would refund my tuition or train me free of charge for up to a year until I mastered the program. (His offer did not take into account how much capital I would put up.)

Despite the guarantee, I wanted to know more about what I was going to learn in the class and what kind of return I could realistically expect to earn. Profit Strategies gave me a glimpse of what to expect.

“Work your tail off”

Profit Strategies (PS) takes the total-immersion approach to education, kind of like throwing you into the pool to force you to learn how to swim. That’s how I felt during PS’s free Active Investor Methods class at the Hilton Miami Airport. The two-day course, which had about 40 students, mixed beginners with trading veterans. We skipped the introductory material and jumped right into trading strategies.

The instructors, Mike and Jay, detailed several complicated systems. One moment we were discussing how to use a spike in a stock’s one-day trading volume to predict whether the price would rise. The next moment we were reviewing how to construct an “iron condor,” a strategy of buying and holding four different options with different strike prices. Between the presentations, Mike and Jay flogged PS’s eight-week courses on various trading systems, each of which cost $3,495. Students in the course would meet with the instructor online once a week for class and to review trades. “Only a limited number of seats left,” Jay said.

The audience had the opportunity to pepper Mike and Jay with questions. A newcomer asked them what kind of return one should expect to earn from trading. Mike said that a 5% monthly return sounded reasonable. That works out to 80% annualized.

All the seminars I attended were quick to point out that individual results will vary. And there’s the rub. Because the performance of individual traders is not public, you have no way of knowing how well these trading programs work. Sure, the seminars present testimonials from their top earners, but you don’t know how well the average student does. Studies show how tough it is to succeed at trading. In 1999, for example, at the height of the day-trading craze, the North American Securities Administrators Association studied the accounts of day traders. Only 11% consistently generated profits, and 70% sustained losses that wiped out their accounts. None of the seminar com-panies monitors the success rate of all their graduates. Says Judy Hackett, BetterTrades’ marketing chief: “We can only track the satisfaction of our customers, and we have lots of very happy customers.”

Students who have succeeded with these systems swear by them. Jeffery Kronenberg, a 30-year-old from New York City, says he is able to support himself using the skills he learned at OTA. He has been a full-time trader since October 2009 after taking a class last May. “You have to work your tail off,” says Kronenberg, who typically gets up at 6:30 a.m. on trading days and works until the markets close at 4 p.m. “They will teach you, but you’ve got to really want it,” says Abba Genes, 26, of Mount Vernon, N.Y. He adds that the skills he acquired from BetterTrades allow him to earn about $1,000 a month to supplement his income as a concierge. Genes, who trades three hours a day in the morning, plans to become a full-time trader after he completes college. He says it took months before he learned how to generate trading profits. Meanwhile, big early losses nearly wiped out his account.

The seminar instructors I met said they made a good living from trading. But it’s impossible to know whether they are successful traders or just great salesmen. The trading-education industry does not have a good track record when it comes to sales practices. Seminar promoter Teach Me to Trade shut down in the U.S. after the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a 2008 complaint against two of its salespeople. The SEC alleged that in Teach Me to Trade seminars the pair claimed to be successful traders, but they actually earned their millions from commissions selling seminars rather than from trading. In December 2009, Investools paid $3 million to settle an SEC complaint that two of its salesmen misrepresented themselves at seminars as expert traders.

As I completed my journey, I couldn’t help but wonder why those who possess the magic formulas for successful trading would give away their secrets -- even if they did earn $4,000 or so per customer. After all, if you can earn 80% a year, why would you run the risk of seeing the effectiveness of your strategy diminish as more and more people started using it (a common occurrence in investing)? That aside, what’s clear is that if you decide to learn how to trade from any of these companies, you will need to have faith that your instructors know what they are doing and that you can convert their knowledge into winning moves. The odds will be against you.

Why it’s hard to trade and win

High costs. Most trading programs charge more than $4,000 for their workshops and tutoring packages. In addition, trading generates a lot of commissions, usually $5 to $9 per stock trade at the typical discount broker.

Too much time. It can take years of practice to earn trading profits consistently. Even if you are not trading on a daily basis, you will have to dedicate several hours a week to studying charts and related data.

Potential losses. Trading can lead to huge investment losses. This isn’t for widows, orphans and those with weak stomachs.

Tough competition. Financial firms have better trading tools than you do. High-frequency trading systems utilized by professionals make it harder for individual traders to succeed.


Introductory Offer: Get Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine for $12. Save 75%!

DISCUSS

Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy

Reader Comments (28)

Posted by: Alex at 02/19/2010 09:23:32 AM

Good expose of these get-rich-easy salesmen. Another way to look at these guys is to use Golf as an example. This is what they propose - know little about gold but take our weekend course and then within a few months your handicap should be under 5! So you know little about trading. Take our weekend course and within a few months you can compete for the same $ as the professionals in the market who've been honing their skills for years. Folks, there's NO difference.

Posted by: Chris Koomey at 02/19/2010 05:37:00 PM

As the first named defendant in this article, the Online Trading Academy does not promote in any way that there is a secret, a magic formula, a software program or some super, complex, trading system that is a substitute for the discipline and hard work that it takes to succeed in any profession, including trading and investing. There is no get-rich-quick hype in what we do...(we are) the world's most trusted name in trader and investor education, the Online Trading Academy. At the Online Trading Academy, we teach people the tools and techniques used by professional investors and traders and provide them a community of support and ongoing access to our learning resources as they pursue this essential life skill. If you want to learn what we really do, go to our website (www.tradingacademy.com) or come to a workshop at your local Online Trading Academy learning center.

Posted by: Tony Booker at 02/20/2010 05:41:47 PM

I'm very disappointed to see a journalist from Kiplinger's write an article claiming to be a an "expose." After attending a three hour seminar. An expose involves going to class and then trading for at least a year; and then writing an article. I attended OTA's seminar in October of 2007 and didn't attend the class until May 2009. It's one of the best decisions I have made; I had an advantage because I didn't know anything about the market. I wasn't poisoned with the information promoted by traditional Wall Street advisors and magazines like yours that promote the "You are too stupid......You can't compete" model which keeps your magazine in business. The reason that most people fail at trading is not because of the difficulty in learning technical analysis; that's the easy part of trading. It's the pyschology and risk management is what causes people to fail. To put OTA in the category of "Get Rich Quick," is irresponsible. OTA from day one tells you it's not about making money, it's about not losing money. Their principles are to not worry about making money; concentrate on not losing money and the money will come. This article is pure nonsense. Human flaws are why people fail not because they are too dumb.

Posted by: Christian at 02/20/2010 07:29:32 PM

As a student of OTA I am biased. The instructors teach that if you are going to trade you need to treat your trading as a business; there are no short cuts to success but success is obtainable. You are not told how to become a millionaire overnight, you are taught how not to lose money and if you lose money lose very little. You are taught that a successful trader/ business professional you need knowledge, discipline, commitment, and to have a trading plan. You will lose money before you make money but with time and experience you will get better. Trading is a profession and like any other profession it can be learned. The best example I can give is if you wanted to learn how to be a boxer. Youre going to get knocked down a few times before you learn how to fight. Success is not easy.

Posted by: John T at 02/21/2010 08:19:18 AM

...I attended the OTA course he commented about last year and found it very informative even with my 55 years of trading. Yeah, I'm an old guy. If Mr. Andersen thinks he can learn how to profitably trade in a few days he is woefully mistaken as my tenure proves. His comments about commission costs are misleading. I trade 100 shares for less than a dollar! It does take a lot of time but at least its not wasted like most is on liberal college grads. Losses are controlled by risk management. Who said it would be easy? If you don't want to run with the big boys stay on the porch.

Posted by: Constance Omorodion at 02/21/2010 11:06:13 AM

Granted that it is very expensive in this country to learn the skills of trading. To become a successful trader, you've got to want it and be disciplined. It takes time but you'll succeed if you stay focused. You need broad knowledge of the market and how it works. I am a beginner trader, and I have encountered many losses but I'm not giving up beause I see the potential. am determined to make it work.

Posted by: Yuri at 02/21/2010 03:46:42 PM

Basically the article is about nothing, since Thomas Anderson clearly has no clue about the subject...Looks like the article was written well before Mr. Anderson showed up for class, because it's so full of preconceived ideas. The opening line says it all: "He spent days sitting through free seminars to become a super trader". I mean what kind of a person would expect a free seminar with a complimentary lunch to turn him into a pro? The author's math skills aren't impressive either, when he says later in the article: Mike said that a 5% monthly return sounded reasonable. That works out to 80% annualized...Sounds like fashion magazine trying to cover debt restructuring arrangements. Unprofessional. I have visited a few free seminars delivered by Chris Koomey and other OTA experts. They are bona fide educators. Since I am a practicing trader with 10+ years of experience, I can instantly tell hype from real deal. If the idea of paying for the education makes someone sick, check out the wealth of free online resources that the OTA makes available to anyone who is willing to learn. Youll get much of your education for free, if you can....

Posted by: Jeff at 02/22/2010 02:10:51 PM

You seriously had to go undercover to figure this stuff out and determine that the 'free trading' classes are just sales pitches? So, if you give me your bank acct number, I need somebody to hold $10,000,000 while I undergo an audit, once complete, wire me the money back, and I'll let you keep 10% for your troubles....

Posted by: Marty at 02/22/2010 03:01:21 PM

Thanks for exposing...I attended a Better Trades "seminar" for kicks a year ago. I found it a high pressured sales presentation with a bunch of sales people trolling for suckers. I feel sorry for those that got taken by their $3995 special offer. By the way, it took months to have their spam emails stopped. I was only able to have them stopped by reporting them to the Las Vegas Better Business Bureau - they are licensed there. You should repeat this story every few months so people learn...

Posted by: Doug Rinker at 02/22/2010 03:05:43 PM

Hey!...the OTA is an exceptional educational organization. Understanding the simple laws of supply and demand, and applying the risk management techniques professed within all OTA training, far outperforms any form of mutual fund, stock broker/advisor or media-based financial rag that professes herd mentality minutiae. I've never heard of BetterTrades or Profit Strategies, but as an OTA graduate, and a self-taught trader who merely broke even for many years, I can assure you that OTA's message is on target and highly effective. As another gentleman suggested, you should attend the class, comprehend it, and then apply the techniques for at least a year before attempting to assess any value or not...

Posted by: Bob at 02/22/2010 03:34:27 PM

I liked the article, but it was too kind. Like blood in the water, it brought the sharks out in force.

Posted by: H Pfsiterer at 02/22/2010 03:38:53 PM

Thank you, it is appreciated that Kiplinger has come forth expressing herd mentality, and abusive fees.

Posted by: Michael at 02/22/2010 03:45:44 PM

Clearly the OTA people have gotten chapped by the article and have pummeled the comments section. Uh, yeah, I really believe the "students" of OTA line of commentary...a comment in defense is a good idea; giving five dubious testimonials right after is not a good idea. You lose more credibility than if you'd have left it completely alone.

Posted by: Peter at 02/22/2010 10:40:55 PM

"Because the performance of individual traders is not public, you have no way of knowing how well these trading programs work!" ROI is what needs stated by all who comment here. I've been to those seminars and they never have any proof of what the preach. Just a lot of smoke and mirrors. Most of the comments below are salesmen of OTA.

Posted by: Robert Berish at 02/22/2010 11:09:27 PM

Mr. Thomas Anderson: Take heed from these reader comments......these people have definitely become successful by the Online Trading Education.....I see Doug's outstanding trades made in our daily two hour classes on XLT Online trading Futures program four times a week, and I am certain that comments from the others are coming from outstanding traders in this difficult market. The techniques that are used arise from hard work, discipline, courage, and more importantly, patience. There is no doubt in my mind that the traps from Wall Street in costs, lies, and innuendos make certain that fundamental trading/investing will provide no consistent profits to the average person. OTA gives one a program to be successful in the vagaries of trading and is consistently effective for one not needing an elaborate trading office to be successful.

Posted by: Tom Anderson at 02/23/2010 06:18:43 PM

Hello, this is Tom Anderson from Kiplinger, author of this article. Thanks for the comments. I want to respond to some of the points you have made: * Chris, OTAs Web site says that if I invest a few life-changing hours in the free Power Trading Workshop I will discover a complete approach to trading that will give the ability to trade with the skill and confidence of the pros. Instead, I found a sales pitch for pricey classes. * Tony, this article was about free trading seminars. I could have spent thousands of dollars and a year trading to gauge the effectiveness of these courses, but thats not the story I aimed to write. My intention was to judge whether I would take the plunge to buy these expensive courses based on the materials presented in the free seminars. My conclusion is a firm no. In my judgment, the presentations I attended were less than comprehensive at best and misleading at worst. Kiplinger has long been an advocate of do-it-yourself, low-cost investing. * John, Im sure you can find a broker that will charge you $1 in commissions to trade a 100 shares. However, those low commissions come with strings attached -- you have to trade very frequently, pay a large monthly subscription fee or have a seven-figure account balance. * Yuri, my calculation is correct. I dont think you are considering the effects of monthly compounding at 5%. FV = PV * (1+ i)^t FV is future value, PV is present value, i is the interest rate (5% in this case) and t is time (12 months in a year in this case). When you calculate the percentage change of PV to FV, youll find it is 79.5856%. I rounded up to 80%. And if you saw how I dress, you would know I dont work for a fashion magazine. Appreciate the feedback. Feel free to respond in the comments section or e-mail me directly at tanderson@kiplinger.com if you want to follow up.

Posted by: Shaun Gangji at 02/24/2010 12:16:10 AM

OTA is the best...i changed my life, trading is an art and science, it must be practiced, most fail..because of psychology...ota never said I would get rich quick. in fact they teach slow and steady......Chris and Paul at OTA are some of the kindest people you will ever meet, it was the best INVESMENT i have ever made, without OTA i would have lost alll my money learning the hard way...I can sit down at my computer and make money at will, i have been tading for 18 months, and have been consistently profitable for 4 months...Thanks OTA =)

Posted by: Ringo at 02/24/2010 01:51:09 PM

I have taken course from Better trades, Online Trading Academy and Rich Dad poor Dad with Rober Kiyosaki waiting with his pocket open to take my money....(OTA) is the only school where I can come into their center daily and trade live market. Not paper trading or simulated trading and use the schools capital. For those who understand trading, learning in a live enviroment is just one part of the equation. If the writer of this article was anything other than a critic, he would have done just a little more reasearch before he finished this article. Clearly he's not a trader nor will he ever become one.

Posted by: Joe at 02/24/2010 04:02:30 PM

I think all you OTA guys are burnt by Thomas exposer. I do understand that it's really hard to accept TRUTH. I totally agree with Thomas, you guys' only purpose is sales pitch trading courses.

Posted by: Anonymouse at 02/24/2010 11:18:53 PM

This is ridiculous. People should focus on buying good profitable companies, not trading. The only people who make money "trading" is the brokers. Market-makers scalp off the buy-sell spread of every deal. Brokers charge a commission on every sale. They nickel-and-dime you all over the place. This eats into any real earnings a stock holder-owner may earn. Wall Street doesn't care if a stock goes up or down, as long as people keep trading, that's where they make their money. You, dear investor, must make it the hard way. Buy good companies, those companies produce real goods and services at a profit, the profit is either paid back to the owner or re-invested to grow the company, the value of the assets and earning power of the company will eventually be reflected in the price. Focus on the company itself. Take pride in knowing what you're buying. VOTE in your companies proxies... IS YOUR CEO EARNING THE WAGES THE BOARD YOU ELECTED IS PAYING HIM ? !!!!

Posted by: shaun gangji at 02/26/2010 02:56:14 AM

...go ahead....buy and hold, I need a sucker on the other side of my trade, ill buy it from you when there is blood in the street and you get scared out of the market for a 20-30% loss, then will sell it back to you when the price gets high, and you get greedy...

Posted by: Tom F at 02/26/2010 10:35:48 AM

...Can one really expect to make millions at anything without a LOT of hard work? I've been in class with Jeff Kronenberg. Hey Jeff, I'm glad Mr. Anderson's article failed to focus in on what you said!...thanks to Mr. Anderson! Your article has accomplished two things. Firstly, you have probably managed to keep (and maybe even grow!) your readers who are comfortable with buy and hold...And secondly, we can rest assured that there will be an even larger pool of "investors" that will pay us.

Posted by: Tom Anderson at 02/26/2010 06:05:15 PM

Hi, this is Tom Anderson again. Appreciate all the comments. Want to address the points Shaun and Tom F have made. The idea that trading-seminar students are drinking the milkshakes of buy-and-hold investors is questionable. Trading is a zero-sum game. You are more likely to be drinking the milkshakes of your fellow traders than buy-and-hold investors because, by definition, they don't trade as often. This is especially true when you are following the same rulebook as your classmates.

Posted by: Alex at 03/01/2010 01:06:53 PM

Yep, I agree. The obvioulsy fake testimonials (has everyone noticed that fake ones normally always read like marketing) tend to do more damage that if the people had kept their traps shut. Nevertheless, there are plenty of suckers around so don't expect these 'marketers' to close up shop.......

Posted by: Amadis de Gaul at 03/02/2010 11:41:00 PM

The audience had the opportunity to pepper Mike and Jay with questions. A newcomer asked them what kind of return one should expect to earn from trading. Mike said that a 5% monthly return sounded reasonable. That works out to 80% annualized. Isn't that supposed to be 60%? Just wondering^^

Posted by: Kenneth S. Whitfield Jr. at 03/07/2010 01:55:22 AM

Online Trading Academy has got to be one of the sorriest businesses that I have ever seen, or been to. When someone does not break under their high-pressure selling tactics, they will start telling the person that they will lose all their money...if they don't buy their product... how crappy I was treated...I wonder how many complaints have been sent...I don't know; but I know that at least one will be sent in the near future though!!!

Posted by: Steve at 03/09/2010 10:54:23 PM

It's too bad that anyone defending the Online Trading Academy is immediately labeled a salesman for the company. I did work as a saleman for OTA before deciding to trade on my own for a living. I also spent several thousand dollars with Investools. Between the two, I know that OTA taught me how the market truly works, how any market works, supply and demand. OTA doesn't try to make it idiot proof with green arrows or red arrows. They tell you up front it takes work, practice and a plan. If you don't have a plan you will lose your money. Why would the OTA instructors teach when they could just make money as a trader? Why are there teachers at medical schools? They can make more money as a doctor, can't they? Some people just enjoy teaching others. Some people don't like seeing others lose all their money because they trusted Fidelity or Vanguard. They don't want to see others lose their money because their Morgan Stanley money manager doesn't believe in shorting. Doesn't believe in it? WTF? Yes, the free seminar is a sales pitch. You get what you pay for. But their education is good, maybe the best. If you have the desire to learn and are willing to do the work, make a plan, and have strict discipline to follow your plan, you will be successful. I think the plan and discipline is more important than the education firm. But even the best surgeon had to go to school and it probably was not free.

Posted by: Mel at 05/24/2010 12:53:11 AM

The author apparently went into this article believing that it is possible to attend a "seminar" and come out the door a professional trader. He seems to be hung up on the fact that one actually has to put in some effort to make money. He uses numerous quotes to support his position, which clearly suggests a lack of ANY PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE...Now, he's an authority on the subject? Trading the markets is like any other profession. One must acquire the proper skill sets and practice the craft to succeed. If it were for the lazy, or the undisciplined, then everyone would be rich. This is what Online Trading Teaches it's students! How many "buy and hold investors(?)" do you know who have made a months salary in a couple of hours in a morning...I didn't have a clue before Online Trading Academy!




Connect With Kiplinger

E-mail Updates: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox.

email-sign-up

Featured Videos From Kiplinger




facebook
twitter
RSS