Slide Show | February 2014

See All Slide Shows   Page 1 of 13  

10 Worst Cities for Singles

slideshow image

Thinkstock

Sorry, singles, but these cities just aren't that into you. The places that are ranked poor for the unmarried may be quite lovely for couples, families or retirees. But based on economic and demographic factors, we found these cities to be far from perfect matches for resident bachelors and bachelorettes.

How did we come up with our list of the worst cities for singles? We started by looking for metropolitan areas with more than 125,000 people. Then we penalized places with small populations of singles, including the never-married, divorced and widowed. The share of unmarried residents in each of these bottom-ten cities is well shy of the national average.

Financial indicators didn't boost the cities' attractiveness. Although many of these areas boast below-average living costs, paychecks typically are way below average, too. We also factored in education level, keeping in mind that people with bachelor's and advanced degrees are more likely to be gainfully employed. After all, you can't exactly rock the single lifestyle without the earnings to fund it.

On the bright side, we scoured our rankings for areas near these ten cities that might serve as suitable alternatives. Take a look.

Population and income data come from the U.S. Census Bureau. Cost-of-living data is provided by the Council for Community and Economic Research, which tracks living expenses nationwide.

10 Worst Cities for Singles
Advertisement

Popular Slideshows


print / view as single page order a reprint
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register

Featured Videos From Kiplinger