Q. I read that communities in 54 states and territories (including a few in Canada and Mexico) are vying to be the site of Amazon.com’s second headquarters, offering lavish tax breaks, up-front grants and free land to entice the Seattle-based retailer. I own a small but growing business in one of these cities, and although it’s no Amazon, I’d love—but am not likely to get—the same deal. Am I being reasonable in feeling a little resentful?
A. Yes, you are, and local officials should listen carefully to this frequent complaint from established businesses that see financial incentives showered only on newcomers.
Amazon or any other firm considering a new location should base its decision not on the freebies it can demand for itself alone, but on the general business climate of a state—a climate in which all businesses, existing and newly arrived, can thrive.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
That means a climate of low-to-moderate corporate taxes (on earnings, inventory, property and so on) and workers’ compensation costs, flexible labor laws, plus easy and speedy permitting. Thinking of its employees, a business should consider the total tax burden on their personal income and estates, too.
As for the local officials trying to lure a new business, they shouldn’t offer anything to the new arrival that they aren’t willing to offer their current businesses. Job growth and spending at an existing firm should be worth just as much in incentives as new jobs and capital investment brought in from outside. Shown proof of those new hires and capital spending, the local taxing authority can simply rebate to the growing business some of the taxes it paid the year before. Is the city offering free public land to a relocater? If so, why shouldn’t it offer the same deal to a local business that needs to expand its site, perhaps at a municipal office park or incubator?
And every incentive deal, whether to an established business or a newcomer, should include enforceable methods for recapturing public funds in the event that the promised job creation doesn’t pan out.
Have a money-and-ethics question you'd like answered in this column? Write to editor in chief Knight Kiplinger at ethics@kiplinger.com.
-
Airbnb Host Tells What It's LikeBusiness Costs & Regulation This Denver pharmacist began booking her ski condo a few months after the pandemic hit.
-
Tough Times for a Family BusinessBusiness Costs & Regulation His dry-cleaning operation was rocked by the pandemic, but he is staying optimistic.
-
IRS Gives Truckers a Tax Break in Response to the Colonial Pipeline ShutdownTax Breaks The tax penalty for using dyed diesel fuel for highway use is temporarily suspended.
-
Reliving a Harlem RenaissanceBusiness Costs & Regulation After a tough winter, two sisters look forward to reviving their restaurant’s business.
-
Add a VPN to Surf the Internet SafelyTechnology To help you fight identity theft, consider adding a VPN.
-
Stephanie Creary: Making the Case for Diversity on Corporate BoardsBusiness Costs & Regulation Adding underrepresented voices can improve a company’s bottom line.
-
How We Lose When We Overlook Black TalentBusiness Executives Comments from Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf (pictured) reflect a culture that tramples on clients’ trust and limits opportunities for people of color.
-
Retirees, Create An Emergency Fund for Rental PropertyBusiness Costs & Regulation Build a cushion to protect your income from an unforeseen crisis.
