Q. I’m hearing proposals for the forgiveness of all student debt—an estimated $1.5 trillion—to stimulate retail spending, marriage, homeownership and entrepreneurship among the 44 million people (many of them millennials) now burdened with having to make college-loan payments. What do you think of this idea?
A. Not much. There are many things wrong with how we’ve been financing higher education in recent decades—and there are much better ways to do it—but the wholesale transfer of all this debt to the U.S. taxpayer, without regard for a borrower’s ability to repay, would be morally wrong. It would be an affront to the majority of borrowers who either have already paid off their loans or are managing them okay. And it would disproportionately benefit higher-earning borrowers.
Yes, many students over-borrowed to attend more-expensive colleges than they needed to, or to major in fields without good employment prospects—in each case, their own choices. Yes, many colleges took advantage of excessively easy student credit to jack up their tuitions and expand operating budgets.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
And, yes, many for-profit colleges (some later closed by regulators) grew fat on government-guaranteed loans they arranged for unqualified applicants who got an inferior education and often didn’t graduate. This last group of borrowers can and should get their debts discharged through the classic borrower defense that they were misled and defrauded by the school.
But canceling all student debt isn’t the answer. My favorite reform would be making the repayment of all student loans proportional to the borrower’s future earnings. Monthly loan payments would be capped at, say, 10% of earnings and deducted from one’s paycheck, like income taxes and Social Security. After 25 years, the unpaid balance would be forgiven.
We should also overhaul the many public-service loan-forgiveness programs now in place. These are supposed to allow borrowers who choose certain nonprofit and/or governmental occupations, such as the military, teaching and social work, to discharge their debts, typically after 10 years of timely loan repayment. But the rules are bizarrely complex and the outcomes often uncertain.
-
Senior LIving and Memory Care Facilities Are ImprovingHere are the best senior living communities in 2024, according to a J.D. Power survey.
-
Like the ETF? Check Out the Cheaper CloneName-brand ETFs are offering lower-cost, higher-returning versions of their famous funds. For long-term investors, they might be a better deal.
-
Should Lenders Mail Unsolicited Checks to Potential Borrowers?credit & debt When it comes to preying on weak credit risks, it looks like Wall Street is at it again.
-
Do Adult Children Have an Obligation to Support Needy Parents?savings Even if some siblings can afford to help more than others, no one should shirk the obligation to assist in some way -- financial or otherwise.
-
How Can the Approval Process for New Drugs Be Speeded Up?investing There are many reform proposals, including some from free-market think tanks.
-
Should Ethics Determine Who You Do Business With?Smart Buying Consumers seeking to do business only with ethical companies should ask these questions.
-
Should Colleges Use Collection Agencies for Overdue Student Bills?college Colleges have many potent options for getting students to square their accounts.
-
Hold Soda Makers to Account for Health Woes?Business Costs & Regulation A strong case can be made that it’s unethical for companies to target the very customers who shouldn’t be heavy consumers of a given product.
-
Ways to Protect Borrowers From Predatory Home Lendingreal estate Land contracts drain low-income communities of resources.
-
Should Employers Be Barred From Asking Job Applicants What They Earn?business The effort to ban the “What are you earning?” question is part of a broader movement to make all compensation totally transparent.
