Should You Pay More for Financial Advice Simply Because You Have More?
Consider paying a flat fee instead of the assets under management fee charged by many financial advisers.

Remember when the cost of a stock trade could run into the hundreds or even thousands of dollars? That was when the wirehouses charged commissions based on the volume and price of shares traded. If you remember that, then you remember when an upstart named Charles Schwab came along and told investors his firm could handle all of the stock trades they wanted for a mere $150 per trade. With that move, he may have put some stockbrokers out of business, but he did all investors a favor by helping them realize there is very little cost difference between putting $10,000 and $1 million in the market.
The discount brokers of today have simply taken that concept a step further. How many investors would pay a flat $150 per stock trade now knowing they could pay a discount broker just $7 a trade?
The cost of financial advice has taken a similar path. Since 2008, when the veil was lifted on the shady dealings of Wall Street product manufacturers, the assets under management (AUM) fee compensation model, which charges clients a flat percentage (typically around 1%) of AUM, has spread rapidly. It's thought to be fair, fully transparent and conflict-free, especially when operated by fiduciary-bound, independent advisers. But is it?

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Problems With the AUM Fee Model
While it is more transparent, questions have been raised as to its fairness and its immunity to conflict. Let's go back to the Charles Schwab example. If the cost differential between a $5 million trade and a $5,000 trade is negligible, is it fair for the larger investor to pay a higher commission than the smaller investor? The same question has been posed for assets under management. If it doesn’t cost any more to manage a $5 million portfolio than it does to manage a $1 million portfolio, why should the larger investor pay five times more? While it is true that someone with a $5 million portfolio may have more complex issues than someone with a $1 million portfolio, is it five times as complicated?
Thanks to a relentless bull market, many investors, especially those who utilize a passive investment strategy, have seen the value of their portfolio double in the last seven years. The $5 million investor who paid his adviser an annual fee of $50,000 in 2009 may now be paying him $100,000 annually. Has the value of that adviser’s service doubled in that time? Chances are he is providing the same level of service now as he did in 2009. Why then is he earning twice as much (or slightly less if a graduated fee schedule is used)?
The AUM-fee model is also coming under criticism for potential conflicts-of-interest issues. An adviser who is paid primarily for managing assets has little incentive to offer advice in areas that could reduce AUM, such as using assets to pay off a mortgage or invest in a business. Investing in an income annuity might be the right strategy if you want to ensure lifetime income sufficiency, but an AUM-fee-only adviser would not be compensated for the investment. Most adviser-fiduciaries strive to be conflict-free in dispensing advice, but the method of compensation may at times influence that advice.
Plus, through technology and competition, investment management has largely become commoditized. As a way to add value, many advisers are shifting more of their focus towards holistic planning by delivering more financial planning services. Yet they are still using AUM-centric pricing model, which tends to keep your focus on your portfolio rather than your planning needs.
The Flat Fee: A Completely Client-Centric Alternative
In recognition of these potential conflicts-of-interest, as well as the issue of fair pricing, the advice-pricing model continues to evolve. In recent years, the advisory landscape has been experiencing a shift towards a flat-fee-for-advice or retainer-fee model that removes all potential conflicts of interest and is based solely on the level of services provided.
With a flat-fee model, you simply pay for unbiased advice, rather than an investment product. It provides the most complete transparency and fairness in that it aligns the pricing of services directly with the cost of delivering those services.
More importantly, an annual flat retainer completely changes the client-advisory relationship, with the emphasis placed on the holistic nature of financial planning. Although portfolio management should remain an integral part of the relationship, it is more aligned with all the elements of your financial life, including retirement planning, estate planning, income tax planning, risk management and cash flow planning, as well any investments the adviser is not managing. Under a flat-fee arrangement, all elements receive the appropriate attention based on their priority at any given time.
The amount charged under a flat-fee arrangement is typically based on how much input the adviser gives you, not the amount of assets you bring him, regardless of the direction of the market. So you can rest assured that you will receive the same level of service and attention in good and bad markets. Most advisory firms that charge flat fees will price them according to multiple levels of services they provide, allowing you to select the one that is appropriate for your needs.
While AUM-based fees may not completely go the way of commissions and other product-centric forms of compensation, investors today are leading the charge for more transparency, fewer conflicts-of-interest and fairness in their advisory relationships. One day, we will be asking, “Why would anyone pay 1% on AUM knowing they can pay a simple flat fee for advice?”
Pete Woodring is founding partner of San Francisco Bay area Cypress Partners, a fee-only wealth consulting practice that provides personalized, comprehensive services that help retirees and busy professionals to enjoy life free of financial concern.
Craig Slayen, a new partner with Cypress Partners, contributed to this article.
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Woodring is founding partner of San Francisco Bay area Cypress Partners, a fee-only wealth consulting practice that provides personalized, comprehensive services that help retirees and busy professionals to enjoy life free of financial concern.
-
‘Are You Better Off Than You Were 71 Days Ago?’ Cory Booker Marathon Senate Speech Highlights Tax Debate
Tax Policy A speech protesting Trump’s policies, including tax plans, breaks U.S. Senate records.
By Kelley R. Taylor Published
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Are Mixed Before Liberation Day
Markets are getting into the freewheeling rhythm of a second Trump administration.
By David Dittman Published
-
Winning Strategies for Financial Advisers as Clients' Lives Evolve
How can the wealth management industry help make life transitions easier for the adviser and the client?
By David Conti, CPRC Published
-
How Advisers Can Establish Relationships With HNW Prospects
These strategies can help to build influence with high-net-worth individuals, who are often looking to an adviser for insight rather than solutions.
By Jeremy Green, CFP®, CTFA, CLU®, CEBS®, AEP®, EA, MSFS Published
-
When Your Car Is Fixed, But You've Still Got the Problem
This reader's experience with trying to get squealing brakes fixed under an extended warranty mirrors what others are experiencing these days.
By H. Dennis Beaver, Esq. Published
-
Seven Questions to Ask When Evaluating Personal Loan Options
Taking out a personal loan too hastily could lock you into unfavorable terms with an untrustworthy lender. Ask these questions before signing anything.
By David Kimball Published
-
The Three Biggest Fears Keeping Retirees Up at Night
Here are the steps you can take to put those fears to rest and retire with confidence so you can relax and enjoy the life you've planned.
By Pam Krueger Published
-
What Can a Donor-Advised Fund Do for You? (A Lot)
DAFs and private foundations go about helping charities (and those who donate) in different ways. Each comes with its own benefits and restrictions to navigate.
By Julia Chu Published
-
Estate Planning When You Have International Assets
Estate planning gets tricky when you have assets and/or beneficiaries outside the U.S. To avoid costly inheritance mistakes, it pays to understand the basics.
By Kelsey M. Simasko, Esq. Published
-
Three Essential Estate Planning Steps to Protect Your Nest Egg
After dedicating years to building your wealth and securing your future, make sure your assets are protected and your loved ones are provided for in the future.
By Nicole Farbo, CFP® Published