A Fundamentally Better Index?
Index funds that weight companies by measures other than market value may offer better returns.
Index funds have a lot to offer, and I believe most investors should have at least some of them in their portfolios (Good News About Index Funds). They charge little and guarantee that you'll earn the average return for whatever market the index fund is designed to copy. Over time, the average return beats the returns of most actively managed funds.
But something's always bugged me about traditional indexes, and I'm starting to think there's a fundamentally better alternative.
Row 0 - Cell 0 | Good News About Index Funds |
Row 1 - Cell 0 | One Fund to Own It All |
Take Standard & Poor's 500-stock index, the most popular index based on the amount of money invested in funds that track it. Like most indexes, the S&P 500 is capitalization-weighted, meaning that the biggest companies, as measured by their market value (number of shares outstanding times share price), get a larger weighting than smaller companies. At the height of the tech bubble in early 2000, for example, the combined weight of the two top stocks, Microsoft and General Electric, equaled that of the 250 smallest stocks in the S&P 500.

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
At its worst, the S&P 500 is a reflection of the herd instinct. Investors pile into the same few stocks -- and keep piling in for the sole reason that the prices of those stocks have been rising precipitously because we keep piling into them. As a result, it's virtually certain that a big chunk of the index will often be in overvalued companies.
Fortunately, fans of index funds now have choices that may be better than traditional, cap-weighted products. For years I've followed the development of "fundamental indexes," which weight stocks by what the investing community calls "fundamentals": such basic measures as sales and profits. For a deeper examination of the phenomenon, see contributing editor David Landis's Reinventing the Index .
Several providers of exchange-traded funds have made a big push into fundamental indexing. For example, PowerShares offers a family of funds based on fundamental indexes, led by PowerShares FTSE RAFI US 1000 (symbol PRF). The funds are based on work by the father of fundamental indexing, Robert Arnott, who relies on earnings, revenue, cash flow and book value to weight stocks.
Another firm, WisdomTree, sponsors ETFs that weight companies mainly according to the cash dividends they pay out. Stocks of dividend-paying companies, it maintains, do better over time. RevenueShares markets funds that weight companies according to their gross sales, an approach that has the effect of overweighting companies with low price-to-sales ratios. Over time, RevenueShares says, shares of such companies perform better than more-expensive stocks.
All of these fundamental-indexing advocates claim to have back-tested data that show that their methods beat cap-weighted indexes over long periods. Of the lot, RevenueShares' method makes the most sense to me, maybe because of its simplicity. Its method de-emphasizes ridiculously overpriced stocks and filters out a lot of the noise that influences other fundamentals -- revenues, for example, are far more stable than profits from quarter to quarter.
The short-term results of most RevenueShares ETFs have been terrific. For example, from the stock market's bottom on March 9 through August 27, RevenueShares Large Cap (RWL), the ETF that competes most closely with S&P 500 index funds, beat the index by ten percentage points; RevenueShares Mid Cap (RWK) beat its bogey by 21 percentage points.
Sean O'Hara, president of investor services for RevenueShares, says back-testing shows that over decades, the firm's methods beat traditional indexes by an average of two to three percentage points per year. But back-testing can amount to little more than cherry-picking from history to build a case. And no smart investor acts on short-term results.
Defenders of traditional indexes have recently published studies dissecting fundamental indexing's flaws.
The biggest criticism of large-cap fundamental indexes is that they merely increase the influence of small companies and undervalued companies, two strategies that perform better over time than buying large growth companies. To this I say: That's a criticism? What's wrong with tilting the portion of your portfolio dedicated to large-company stocks toward something that works?
At any rate, RevenueShares' funds have piqued my interest, and I'll be monitoring how they fare as stocks continue to recover from the devastating bear market. Should the ETFs continue to perform well in more-normal times, I'm ready to jump in.
I'm also interested in another kind of index that isn't cap-weighted but isn't exactly a fundamental index, either. It's an equal-weight index, one that assigns each stock in the S&P 500 the same value. Morningstar found that only 7% of actively managed, large-company domestic stock funds beat the S&P equal-weight index over the past ten years. That is remarkable by itself, but it's even more remarkable when you consider that 62% of active funds beat the regular S&P 500 over the same period.
The cheapest way to buy the equal-weight index is with Rydex S&P Equal Weight (RSP), an ETF. The fund itself doesn't have a ten-year record. But over the past five years through August 27, it returned an annualized 2.4%, beating the regular S&P 500 by an average of 1.7 percentage points per year.
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Soar on China Trade Talk Hopes
Treasury Secretary Bessent said current U.S.-China trade relations are unsustainable and signaled hopes for negotiations.
By Karee Venema
-
2026 Disney Dining Plan Returns: Free Dining for Kids & Resort Benefits
Plan your 2026 Walt Disney World vacation now. Learn about the returning Disney Dining Plan, how kids aged three to nine eat free, and the exclusive benefits of staying at a Disney Resort hotel.
By Carla Ayers
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Soar on China Trade Talk Hopes
Treasury Secretary Bessent said current U.S.-China trade relations are unsustainable and signaled hopes for negotiations.
By Karee Venema
-
Stock Market Today: Dow Drops 971 Points as Powell Pressure Ramps Up
President Trump is increasing his attacks against Jerome Powell, insisting the Fed chair cut interest rates.
By Karee Venema
-
Stock Market Today: No 'Powell Put'? No Problem
Investors, traders and speculators look beyond both another Trump post and more signs of slowing economic activity.
By David Dittman
-
Stock Market Today: Dow Drops 699 Points After Powell Speech
Fed Chair Powell warned of a slowing economy and higher inflation but said the central bank isn't ready to cut rates just yet.
By Karee Venema
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Struggle Amid Tariff Uncertainty
Boeing dropped after China suspended new aircraft orders, while Bank of America and Citi climbed on earnings beats.
By Karee Venema
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Gain on Tech, Auto Tariff Talk
The Trump administration said late Friday that it will temporarily halt tariffs on some Chinese tech imports.
By Karee Venema
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Surge to Close a Volatile Week
It was another day with a week's worth of both news and price action, but it ended on a strongly positive note.
By David Dittman
-
Stock Market Today: Uncertainty Proliferates: Dow Loses 1,014 Points
Weaker-than-expected consumer inflation data wasn't enough to stabilize sentiment during another volatile day for financial markets.
By David Dittman