Thanks to the financial services industry, over the decades investors have been conditioned to focus on the returns their portfolios generate, more than on cash flow. The industry has emphasized returns, as they make a great sales tool for financial professionals. But that hardly helps investors (more on the problem with historical and average returns in my next column).
Of course, it is important to have positive returns, but simply focusing on this elevates what I call “sequence of returns risk.” This refers to the phenomena where portfolio returns in the early part of the investment cycle have a disproportionate impact on the long-term outcome of the portfolio – ergo, a 15% loss in year one has a compounding effect that is much greater than having a 15% lost in later years of the investment cycle.
The psychological impact of this is that it often causes investors to change their investment allocation to a more conservative mix, or worse yet sell near market lows, thereby compounding the impact of the early negative returns and making achieving their investment goals much more challenging. If, however, investors were to simply focus on cash flow, then they probably wouldn’t give in to any temptations to time the market or take corrective actions during a downtown, which is a natural part of a full market cycle.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
For instance, take two identical $1 million portfolios, which are set up to distribute $50,000 annually. Investor No. 1 has the unfortunate luck of investing at the peak of the market cycle and being subjected to two negative performance years at the outset. Investor No. 2 experiences positive returns for the first two years.
| Year | Portfolio 1annual return | Ending balance after$50k distribution | Year | Portfolio 2annual return | Ending balance after$50k distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5% | $945,000 | 1 | 10% | $1,050,000 |
| 2 | -3% | $866,650 | 2 | 20% | $1,210,000 |
| 3 | 10% | $903,315 | 3 | -3% | $1,123,700 |
| 4 | 7% | $916,547 | 4 | -5% | $1,017,515 |
| 5 | -15% | $729,065 | 5 | 7% | $1,038,741 |
| 6 | 20% | $824,878 | 6 | -15% | $832,930 |
| 7 | 1% | $783,127 | 7 | 8% | $849,564 |
| 8 | -3% | $709,633 | 8 | -3% | $774,077 |
| 9 | 8% | $716,404 | 9 | 7% | $778,263 |
| 10 | 7% | $716,552 | 10 | 1% | $736,045 |
Average annual return for both portfolios = 2.7%
Experience has taught me that investors like Investor No. 1 will likely become nervous, and at the very least will doubt their strategy and be tempted to sell. Both portfolios have a 10-year average annual return of 2.7%, and both distribute the desired $50,000. The ending balance between the two portfolios is about $20,000 apart, well within a reasonable margin of error for long-term investment return expectations.
Astute investors know that portfolio returns are heavily influenced by market cycles, which are uncontrollable. By focusing on cash-flow, investors are better able to ignore short-term market gyrations and sequence of returns risk. In my next column, I’ll be discussing the importance and significant impact portfolio costs have on long-term performance.
This column is the third in a six-part series on investor education.
- Column 1 – Understanding your goals
- Column 2 – Why benchmarking to the S&P 500 is not a good strategy
- Column 3 – It’s about cash-flow, not returns
- Column 4 – How much are you paying for your portfolio?
- Column 5 – 5 critical questions to ask your financial advisor
- Column 6 – ‘Senior Inflation’ the not so silent retirement killer
-
Best Cold Weather Places to RetirePlaces to live Some like it hot; others not so much. Here are the 12 best places to retire if you can't stand the heat.
-
Getting Divorced? Beware of Hidden Tax Traps as You Divide AssetsDividing assets fairly in a divorce means looking beyond their current values and asking whether they'll create tax liabilities — or tax breaks — in the future.
-
Getting Divorced? Beware of Hidden Tax Traps as You Divide Assets
Dividing assets fairly in a divorce means looking beyond their current values and asking whether they'll create tax liabilities — or tax breaks — in the future.
-
All-You-Can-Eat Buffets: Can You Get Kicked Out for Eating Too Much?Don't plan on practicing your competitive-eating skills at an all-you-can-eat buffet. You can definitely get kicked out. Plus, don't be a jerk.
-
A Social Security Storm Is Gathering: Here's Your Safety PlanIf Social Security reserves are depleted by 2033, as predicted, future benefits could be cut by as much as 21%. Here’s how to weather the impending storm.
-
What a Second Trump Term Means for Investing in Water SafetyA new administration focused on deregulation could change the scope of today's water protections. So, what does that mean for the investors who support them?
-
How to Avoid These 10 Retirement Planning MistakesMany retirement planning mistakes are easily avoidable. Here are 10 to have on your radar so you don't end up running out of money in your golden years.
-
Before the Next Time Markets Sink, Do Your Lifeboat DrillsAn eventual market crash is inevitable. We can't predict when, but preparing for the ups and downs of investing is imperative. Here's what to do.
-
This Late-in-Life Roth Conversion Opportunity Spares Your HeirsExpensive medical care in the later stages of life is an unpleasant reality for many, but it can open a window for a Roth conversion that benefits your heirs.
-
Women, What Is Your Net Worth?Many women have no idea what their net worth is, or even how to calculate it. Many also turn to social media finfluencers for advice. Here's what to do instead.
