You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Today
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more delivered daily. Smart money moves start here.
Sent five days a week
Kiplinger A Step Ahead
Get practical help to make better financial decisions in your everyday life, from spending to savings on top deals.
Delivered daily
Kiplinger Closing Bell
Get today's biggest financial and investing headlines delivered to your inbox every day the U.S. stock market is open.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Adviser Intel
Financial pros across the country share best practices and fresh tactics to preserve and grow your wealth.
Delivered weekly
Kiplinger Tax Tips
Trim your federal and state tax bills with practical tax-planning and tax-cutting strategies.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Retirement Tips
Your twice-a-week guide to planning and enjoying a financially secure and richly rewarding retirement
Sent bimonthly.
Kiplinger Adviser Angle
Insights for advisers, wealth managers and other financial professionals.
Sent twice a week
Kiplinger Investing Weekly
Your twice-a-week roundup of promising stocks, funds, companies and industries you should consider, ones you should avoid, and why.
Sent weekly for six weeks
Kiplinger Invest for Retirement
Your step-by-step six-part series on how to invest for retirement, from devising a successful strategy to exactly which investments to choose.
Scientific Games gets paid whether you win or lose. The company supplies equipment to run state lotteries and pari-mutuel betting at dog and horse race tracks. Lately, the New York City company has been on a roll, buying businesses that extend its gambling franchise to more countries. Citigroup analyst Geoffrey Davis rates the stock (symbol SGMS) a buy based on the potential for Scientific Games to use its size to win more business overseas, particularly in Germany.
In 1974, Scientific Games produced the first scratch-off ticket for the Massachusetts lottery. Now the company makes 15 million scratch-off tickets per year, making it the dominant player in the instant-ticket business with a 65% share of the market.
Scientific Games is also involved in lotteries, such as Powerball, in which players buy a ticket and wait for a television drawing. In January, the company bought Stockholm, Sweden-based rival EssNet for $60 million. EssNet runs online lotteries in Australia and Europe, including those in 13 of 16 German states. "EssNet's online lottery relationships should help the company compete for new instant-ticket business in Germany," Davis says. In March, Scientific Games began operating two German instant-games contracts that Davis believes will add $8 million, or 9 cents a share, to yearly profits. Moreover, he says, the acquisition puts the company in position to vie for at least a dozen more deals in Germany.
From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance
Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
EssNet is only the start of Scientific Games' spending spree. Pending regulatory approvals, the company expects the $183 million purchase of Global Draw, a maker of sports-betting machines in the United Kingdom, to be completed by June. And on April 5, Scientific Games bought a Connecticut betting parlor for $12 million. Scientific Games runs nearly all the off-track betting facilities in Connecticut and operates all on-track and off-track pari-mutuel wagering in the Netherlands under a license that lasts until June 2008.
Despite the moves into other kinds of gambling, the bulk of Scientific Games business is lotteries, which offer a steady stream of recurring revenues. All told, the company generated revenues of $782 million last year, about 75% coming from its lottery operations. It earned $75 million, or 81 cents per share.
Shares of Scientific Games, at $35, are near their all-time high. The stock trades at 28 times the $1.27 per share that analysts, on average, expect the company to earn this year, according to Thomson First Call. Davis thinks the company's gamble on the international lottery market could boost 2006 profits to $1.32 per share. That and future overseas growth makes the stock worth $42.50 a share, he says.
--Thomas M. Anderson
-
Betting on Super Bowl 2026? New IRS Tax Changes Could Cost YouTaxable Income When Super Bowl LX hype fades, some fans may be surprised to learn that sports betting tax rules have shifted.
-
How Much It Costs to Host a Super Bowl Party in 2026Hosting a Super Bowl party in 2026 could cost you. Here's a breakdown of food, drink and entertainment costs — plus ways to save.
-
3 Reasons to Use a 5-Year CD As You Approach RetirementA five-year CD can help you reach other milestones as you approach retirement.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into AMD Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayAdvanced Micro Devices stock is soaring thanks to AI, but as a buy-and-hold bet, it's been a market laggard.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into UPS Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayUnited Parcel Service stock has been a massive long-term laggard.
-
How the Stock Market Performed in the First Year of Trump's Second TermSix months after President Donald Trump's inauguration, take a look at how the stock market has performed.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Lowe's Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayLowe's stock has delivered disappointing returns recently, but it's been a great holding for truly patient investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into 3M Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayMMM stock has been a pit of despair for truly long-term shareholders.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Coca-Cola Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayEven with its reliable dividend growth and generous stock buybacks, Coca-Cola has underperformed the broad market in the long term.
-
If You Put $1,000 into Qualcomm Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You Would Have TodayQualcomm stock has been a big disappointment for truly long-term investors.
-
If You'd Put $1,000 Into Home Depot Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have TodayHome Depot stock has been a buy-and-hold banger for truly long-term investors.
