Smart Investors Ignore the Noise

People don't have a good intuitive sense of how to weigh new information in light of what they already know. They tend to overate it. - Nate Silver, "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail- But Some Don't"

As investors, we hunger for an inside scoop on what the market will do based on an event, real or imagined, that is being considered (for example, Brexit, the Orlando shooting, the U.S. presidential election, etc.). This hunger is being fed by the emergence of a 24/7 news culture that seeks to identify, examine and report each and every possibility of what the outcome will (might) be. This explosion of information too often gets interpreted as knowledge or wisdom but most often, in reality, it is just a piece of data that can be placed with other pieces of data to be considered in arriving at knowledge or wisdom.

What Brexit Means for U.S. Investors

The phrase "signal versus the noise" originated with radio operators. In the early years of radio technology, there was always a lot of static on the receiving end. It was vital to differentiate between the signal and the noise. What was valuable (the signal), and what was simply noise? The reason some predictions fail is that the focus possibly is too much on the noise and not on the signal.

From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance

Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just ~~$107.88~~ $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues

CLICK FOR FREE ISSUE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/y99mlvgqmn1763972420.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

A reasonable question is what should investors focus on? What are reliable signals to pay attention to at the expense of the noise?

Asset class valuations on a relative basis have been the most reliable indicator of future returns. When an asset class is expensive it will likely underperform an asset class that is relatively cheap. To some, this may seem like a "blazing grasp of the obvious." But do we as investors really pay attention to how our assets are valued? Or, as Nate Silver remarked in the opening quote of this article, do we pay an inordinate amount of attention to the new data we are being presented with?

Of course, valuations matter in the long-term. In the short term, markets get tossed about by the news of the day. This short-term news cycle phenomenon unfortunately causes too many investors to react and wreak significant damage to their wealth.

The evidence is in the 22nd release of the "Quantified Analysis of Investor Behavior" (QAIB) by Dalbar. Each year, Dalbar conducts a research project comparing the results of investors, driven by their inputs and withdrawal decisions, with the results of the market. Clearly this work is cumulative and not individual, but the consistent message over 22 years of the study is that the emotional part of investing, likely based on the noise present in the marketplace, has an impact on investors' ability to build financial security for themselves and their loved ones.

Of course, election years bring up the decibel level of the noise greatly. Data is often presented by pundits on which party or candidate will benefit investors the most. The reality is that the data points are actually incredibly small, and the number of observations is not statistically significant. For example, since 1872, we have had a whopping 25 presidents serve 36 terms. Franklin D. Roosevelt had four terms, or 11.1% of the observations. One could easily throw out an "outlier," and change the results dramatically.

An interesting statistic is that when an incumbent party has lost, the market has performed the worst. Why? Most likely it's because, when the economy has not performed well, voters have desired change. However, the market doesn't appreciate change so much.

Clearly, short-term news has a knee-jerk impact on the markets, and for speculators whose focus in on the short term, the news (noise) can have an impact. Yet, as seen above, timing the market most often has a disastrous impact on building and preserving wealth. Probabilities of success are much higher when the focus is on the signal. Valuations and sound portfolio construction of a well-diversified portfolio with multiple asset classes will serve investors much better than being distracted by all the noise.

Business Spending: Materials Costs Start to Ease, Labor Costs Not So Much

Bob Klosterman, CFP, is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of White Oaks Investment Management, Inc., and author of the book, The Four Horsemen of the Investor’s Apocalypse.

Disclaimer

This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA.

TOPICS

Robert Klosterman, CFP® is the CEO and Chief Investment Officer of White Oaks Investment Management, Inc., a fee-only investment management and wealth advisory firm. Bob is the author of the book, "The Four Horsemen of the Investor's Apocalypse. White Oaks has been recognized by CNBC.com as one of the "Top 100 Fee-Only Wealth Management firms in the country.