Stock Basics: Keep an Eye on Earnings
This is the bottom line: profits. Plus, share prices and earnings can help you compare stocks.
Do you own stocks or stock funds? If the answer is yes, this tutorial can help you develop a portfolio that makes sense for you. If the answer is no, this planning center has the information and advice you need to confidently place your first buy order.
Here is what you need to know about earnings.
How much does the company earn?
This is the bottom line you hear so much about. It boils down the company's year (or quarter) into a nice, neat number. Earnings per share is the company's net income (after taxes and after funds are set aside for preferred-stock dividends) divided by the number of common-stock shares outstanding.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Earnings reports may differentiate between income produced by regular operations and income from unusual transactions, such as the sale of a subsidiary.
When a company is described as growing at a certain rate, it's usually the earnings that are being used as the measure, and successful pros look for companies with a strong record of rising earnings.
How does the price relate to earnings?
Divide the current price of a stock by its earnings for the last 12-month period and you have the price-earnings ratio. The "P/E" is probably the most widely used analytical tool among stockpickers, and for good reason: It tells you what investors think of a particular stock compared with other stocks and compared with the stock market as a whole.
Actually, there are two ways to express a P/E ratio: The most common way is to use the previous year's earnings; the number is called a "trailing" P/E. Sometimes analysts use their earnings forecasts to calculate a potential P/E for a company, in which case it is called an "anticipated" P/E or something similar.
The fact that investors are willing to pay 40 times earnings for one stock and only 15 times earnings for another seems to indicate that the first stock is more highly regarded than the second, and you wouldn't go too far wrong thinking of it that way.
Perhaps investors feel more confident that the first company will be able to increase its earnings faster than the second company. Or perhaps they just expect the price of the first company's stock will rise faster than the second company's stock.
Still, a company's P/E ratio doesn't provide an investment clue until it's compared with P/E values of the same company over past years, the P/Es of other companies in the same business and the P/Es of stock indexes representing the market as a whole.
A stock selling for $10 a share with earnings of ten cents a share may seem cheap. But its P/E of 100 actually makes it vastly more expensive than a $50 stock with earnings of $2.50 a share (a P/E of 20).
A stock with an especially high P/E may be the victim of investors' unrealistic expectations. Even a slight stumble could send the price tumbling — as is the case for many dot-com or tech issues.
The idea is to buy your stock at the lowest possible P/E. As others begin to recognize the stock's potential, they may bid up the price (and thus the P/E).
That is your hope, of course, but reality doesn't always oblige. Sometimes a rise in earnings per share may actually be accompanied by a drop in price.
Why?
Because expectations were that earnings would climb higher than they actually did.
Remember: Investors buy a stock not for what it can do for them today, but for what they hope it will do for them tomorrow. If it doesn't live up to expectations, they will tend to bail out.
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
-
Take Charge of Retirement Spending With This Simple Strategy
To make sure you're in control of retirement spending, rather than the other way around, allocate funds to just three purposes: income, protection and legacy.
By Mark Gelbman, CFP® Published
-
Here's How To Get Organized And Work For Yourself
Whether you’re looking for a side gig or planning to start your own business, it has never been easier to strike out on your own. Here is our guide to navigating working for yourself.
By Laura Petrecca Published
-
Europe Faces Economic and Political Headwinds Next Year
The Letter Challenges for Europe: Potential tariffs, high energy prices and more competition from China will weigh on the bloc in 2025.
By Rodrigo Sermeño Published
-
Don't Sleep on Japan's Economic Transformation
The Letter After almost three lost decades, Japan — one of the world's biggest economies — is finally showing signs of life.
By Rodrigo Sermeño Published
-
Start-ups Trying to (Profitably) Solve the World’s Hardest Problems
The Letter More investors are interested in companies working on breakthrough science to tackle huge societal challenges. The field of deep tech has major tailwinds, too.
By John Miley Published
-
The Big Questions for AR’s Future
The Letter As Meta shows off a flashy AR prototype, Microsoft quietly stops supporting its own AR headset. The two companies highlight the promise and peril of AR.
By John Miley Published
-
China's Economy Faces Darkening Outlook
The Letter What the slowdown in China means for U.S. businesses.
By Rodrigo Sermeño Published
-
Should We Worry About the Slowing U.S. Economy
The Letter With the labor market cooling off and financial markets turning jittery, just how healthy is the economy right now?
By David Payne Published
-
Kiplinger Special: How Businesses Should Budget for 2025
Kiplinger Forecasts From fuel to AI software subscriptions, here's what you can expect to pay next year.
By John Miley Published
-
Intel Braces for an Even Tougher Road Ahead
The Kiplinger Letter Amid a long, costly turnaround, Intel resets expectations again. Its new woes raise questions about U.S. industrial policy and global chip competition.
By John Miley Published