Best Deals in Bonds

Municipal bonds remain one of the most attractive fixed-income sectors.

A year ago, I wrote that 2013 would be a mostly stable year for income investors, with yields creeping up but not soaring. That’s about how things turned out, though interest rates eventually rose more than I expected. As a result, you may have lost 1% or 2% in a diversified bond portfolio. I see rates climbing in 2014, but again, not by much.

A Top Wall Street Strategist’s Bullish Outlook for 2014

Where they go may depend on the resilience of the “Great Rotation,” one of the big investment stories of the past year. The idea is that income investors, worried about the prospects of losses in their bonds (whose prices generally move in the opposite direction of rates), bailed out of fixed-income holdings and put the proceeds into shares, adding fuel to 2013’s surging stock market.

It’s a compelling story line, but I’m not persuaded that stocks’ big year came at the expense of bonds and other yield-focused investments. Sure, bonds, real estate investment trusts and preferred stocks suffered through a rough patch in the middle of 2013. But those and other income investments rebounded in late summer and early fall of 2013. Even Treasuries, which led the bond market down in the spring and summer, have regained some lost value. The yield on the benchmark ten-year Treasury, which peaked just below 3% in early September, stood at 2.6% on November 1.

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Save up to 74%
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hwgJ7osrMtUWhk5koeVme7-200-80.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

Sign up

The take-away: There’s a huge difference between the end of a bull market in an investment class and the onset of collapse. Bonds and bond substitutes won’t deliver big total returns in the coming year, but they won’t cause you to lose sleep worrying that your principal will melt.

That said, you don’t want to own too many Treasuries and Treasury-heavy bond-market index funds. The income is too puny. Plus, Treasuries will likely see another year of losses as yields resume their rise once the Federal Reserve finally starts to trim its $85-billion-a-month bond-buying program. Figure that the yield on the ten-year Treasury will hit 3.3% in 2014.

The biggest losers from the Fed’s easy-money policies continue to be people with big bucks in money market funds and CDs. The Fed isn’t likely to lift short-term rates until 2015 at the earliest, so expect another year of zero returns for cash-type investments. That means a loss after inflation, expected to ring in at 2% in 2014.

Tax-free treats. There are some good opportunities in income investing, though. Municipal bonds remain one of the most attractive fixed-income sectors. You can choose from an ocean of sound munis that yield 100% to 110% of what Treasuries of comparable maturity pay. Because muni interest is generally free from federal (and often state and local) income taxes, you can see why they’re a good deal.

As for taxable bonds, I continue to favor single-A- and triple-B-rated corporate debt. On a total-return basis, these investment-grade corporates roughly broke even the past year, their income offsetting mild declines in principal. I also like floating-rate bank-loan funds, which are yielding 3% and up and hold up well in a rising-rate environment (see Get 3% With Low Risk Via Floating-Rate Bond Funds).

If you’re hoping for a sure-shot, big-money tip for 2014, you’ll be disappointed. Nothing is severely undervalued. My best tip is to fish in the deep pool of closed-end income funds whose share prices are languishing well below the value of their underlying assets. Two that have recently swung from selling at premiums to their net asset value per share to discounts are BlackRock Limited Duration (symbol BLW, $17) and John Hancock Income Securities (JHS, $14). The funds, yielding 7.5% and 6.4%, respectively, use borrowed money to boost income. In both cases, the funds’ investment earnings cover their payouts.

Jeffrey R. Kosnett
Senior Editor, Kiplinger's Personal Finance
Kosnett is the editor of Kiplinger's Investing for Income and writes the "Cash in Hand" column for Kiplinger's Personal Finance. He is an income-investing expert who covers bonds, real estate investment trusts, oil and gas income deals, dividend stocks and anything else that pays interest and dividends. He joined Kiplinger in 1981 after six years in newspapers, including the Baltimore Sun. He is a 1976 journalism graduate from the Medill School at Northwestern University and completed an executive program at the Carnegie-Mellon University business school in 1978.