Why Adviser Rankings May Not Be All They Seem
Boiling down financial advisers to a “best of” list sounds like it might be helpful, but the reality often falls short for retirement savers looking for the right help.
People love rankings, whether they involve college basketball, universities or the best places to live. Rarely do consumers dig deeper to determine the criteria behind the rankings.
One of the findings of behavioral finance is that humans love shortcuts, given all the decisions we face day in and day out. Rankings provide just such a shortcut, and most consumers assume that such rankings are independent, objective and properly vetted.
I recently stumbled upon a financial website that provides a bevy of personal finance content to consumers; everything from taxes, credit cards, banking and investing. For the most part, their content is educational in nature and sound. However, the website also provides “rankings” of financial advisers.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Their site includes a ranking of “top financial advisory firms” for nearly 50 markets across the country. According to the site, they’ve “devoted dozens of hours to researching all of the firms” in the area and listed only those that are “fiduciary firms,” which means they are required to act in their clients’ best interest. I believe this site, and others like it, too often are simply revenue generators and lack adequate disclosure and transparency.
It turns out that the firms listed as “top financial advisory firms” paid to be on the list, which is not disclosed anywhere on the website. The only way I discovered this was by contacting the entity to determine how I might be included in the listing. Most consumers would have no idea of knowing that this “best list” requires firms to “pay to play.”
So how should consumers use rankings, if it all, in considering a financial adviser?
Here are some tips that may help:
Who produced the list? Lists that are from publications noted for journalistic integrity are likely to be more robust than those created by an entity you’ve never heard of.
What are the rankings criteria? There are a multitude of metrics that can be used for ranking purposes. Most use a quantitative metric like growth of assets under management or assets per adviser. Some rankings require firms to be of a certain size to even be considered. Make sure you look beyond the numbers to see what factors were used.
What are you seeking in an adviser? Not everything that counts can be measured. For consumers focused on finding an adviser who provides financial planning, which is more qualitative than quantitative, rankings often offer little insight.
Every client is different, and as a result, most adviser rankings offer little in the way to accurately assess how a prospective client might benefit from working with the adviser. Perhaps the best starting points are the helpful checklists both the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA) and the CFP Board offer consumers.
At the end of the day, the only ranking that really matters is your personal satisfaction with your adviser.
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Mike Palmer has over 25 years of experience helping successful people make smart decisions about money. He is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional. Mr. Palmer is a member of several professional organizations, including the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA) and past member of the TIAA-CREF Board of Advisors.
-
Social Security Retroactive Payments and Increases Are Delayed
Public sector retirees, spouses' or surviving spouses' benefits will be delayed until further notice. The SSA must manually adjust benefits for over 3 million beneficiaries.
By Donna LeValley Published
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Surge Ahead of Fed
Tech stocks led the way higher Tuesday as Wall Street looked ahead to Wednesday's Fed announcement.
By Karee Venema Published
-
You've Saved for Retirement: Now You Need a Safe Income Plan
You can't control the markets, but you can control how you withdraw your money. A comprehensive distribution plan can do wonders to help your savings last.
By Cliff Ambrose, FRC℠, CAS® Published
-
The Four Key Pillars of Wealth Management of the Future
The role of the family office is evolving with the Great Wealth Transfer and tech advancements. This is how financial professionals can manage the shifts.
By Daniel DiBiasio Published
-
Five Steps to Answer Your Million-Dollar Retirement Question
Are you saving enough to live comfortably in retirement? Here are the steps you can take now to find out if you're on track or need to adjust your savings.
By Romi Savova Published
-
How to Use DSTs and 1031 Exchanges for Diversification
This hypothetical case study shows how an investor used Delaware statutory trusts (DSTs) to build a diversified 1031 DST portfolio and avoid a $2M tax bill.
By Dwight Kay Published
-
The 4% Rule Doesn't Mean You Won't Go Broke in Retirement
This rule of thumb on how much retirees can safely withdraw per year could lead some to run dry if stocks hit the skids. Annuities could help cover their bases.
By Ken Nuss Published
-
Market Volatility: Creating an Adaptable Retirement Plan
A successful retirement plan takes advantage of favorable market conditions while safeguarding against downturns. Here's what to consider when building yours.
By Cliff Ambrose, FRC℠, CAS® Published
-
Secure Your Retirement Paycheck: The Power of Three Buckets
Putting all of your nest egg in one basket is risky. Try putting it in three buckets for short-term, medium-term and long-term needs instead.
By Pete Tychsen, Investment Adviser Representative Published
-
Risk On, Risk Off: The Mr. Miyagi Approach to Retirement Planning
The first 10 years of retirement are some of the riskiest for your investments, but channeling your inner Karate Kid may help defend your funds against losses.
By Dale Smothers Published