Tie Allowances to Chores?
Allowances are a great way to give kids hands-on experience with money. But should you consider it a perk or compensation?
Get a group of parents together for a discussion about kids and money, and they're almost guaranteed to come to blows over the issue of allowance -- specifically, should their children's allowance be tied to chores.
The last time I wrote about this, I quoted letters from two dads who had set up successful chore-based allowance systems. That prompted a response from reader Bill Fritz, a regular correspondent and champion of the no-pay rule. "Chores are family responsibilities," writes Fritz. "Allowance is part of a child's learning experience with respect to spending and saving."
Besides, says Fritz, "suppose your kid doesn't need his allowance for the next week, so he won't do any of the prescribed chores." A tricky situation -- and one that sometimes makes chore-based systems troublesome.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
In the other camp are parents who don't want an allowance to be a handout, and want their kids to learn the value of working for pay.
One mom has another reason for paying her daughter to do chores. "I think girls are already encouraged far too much to give selflessly for family, and they're under-encouraged to ask for reasonable compensation and seek raises," writes reader Amy Knight. "My daughter's allowance is tied to chores. When she wants a raise, she'll have to ask for it."
To me, the most important thing about allowance is that children actually get one. I define an allowance as a fixed amount of money kids receive on a regular schedule, with the understanding that they will pay for certain agreed-upon expenses.
Because children have to parcel out their cash and make it last, an allowance is the best hands-on tool there is for teaching them to manage money -- and far better than random handouts. Yet more than 40% of youngsters don't receive an allowance, reports a survey by Yankelovich Partners.
Among those who do, by the way, the amount most frequently cited across all age groups (between ages 6 and 17) was $5 to $9 per week (selected by 19% of those surveyed), followed by $10 to $19 per week (selected by 17% of respondents).
Whether linked to chores or not, an allowance system can work if parents believe in it and are organized enough to stick with the program. But if you're wavering between the two camps, I recommend not tying the basic allowance to chores.
Like Fritz, I think chores are a family responsibility. And chore-based systems can raise unanticipated problems if your kids aren't motivated by money or you lose track of the work they've done.
But an allowance isn't a handout, either. It should be tied to financial chores. So, depending on their age, kids should be responsible for paying for their own collectibles, entertainment, mall excursions with friends -- or for text messages on the family cell-phone bill.
To learn the value of working for pay, they can do extra jobs to earn additional cash. Paying for chores on a job-by-by basis also has the advantage of being easier for parents to monitor.
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Janet Bodnar is editor-at-large of Kiplinger's Personal Finance, a position she assumed after retiring as editor of the magazine after eight years at the helm. She is a nationally recognized expert on the subjects of women and money, children's and family finances, and financial literacy. She is the author of two books, Money Smart Women and Raising Money Smart Kids. As editor-at-large, she writes two popular columns for Kiplinger, "Money Smart Women" and "Living in Retirement." Bodnar is a graduate of St. Bonaventure University and is a member of its Board of Trustees. She received her master's degree from Columbia University, where she was also a Knight-Bagehot Fellow in Business and Economics Journalism.
-
Winners and Losers of Fed Rate Cuts
Navigating interest-rate changes can seem daunting, but these areas of the fixed-income market could perform better (or worse) than others.
By Jeffrey R. Kosnett Published
-
What You Should Know About Spousal IRAs
Without spousal IRAs, you would need an earned income to contribute to your retirement account.
By Sandra Block Published
-
How to Motivate Kids to Save
personal finance It's not easy teaching your child to save. Here are some ways readers have incentivized their kids to keep track of their finances.
By Janet Bodnar Published
-
Lessons for Kids From the Crisis
savings One of the greatest opportunities presented by the pandemic is to give children an appreciation for the workings of the economy.
By Janet Bodnar Published
-
Why Financial Education Works
college Money skills learned young will pay off in the long run.
By Janet Bodnar Published
-
The Tooth Fairy Is Leaving Less Under Pillows These Days
savings The average amount that the Tooth Fairy gives kids is down 10% from last year.
By Janet Bodnar Published
-
The Value Test: 300 Colleges That Pass
College Rankings All the schools on our list, from 1 to 300, are best values.
By Janet Bodnar Published
-
6 Ways to Get Your Kids to Do Chores Without Paying Them
spending Kids shouldn't be paid for doing routine tasks, but for doing extra jobs that parents define as above and beyond.
By Janet Bodnar Published
-
Save $1 for College, Cut $2 in Debt
college Paying for college doesn't mean you have to take out thousands in student loans.
By Janet Bodnar Published
-
Back-to-School Money Tips for College Students
college Kiplinger's summer 2015 interns offer advice on managing your finances as a student.
By Janet Bodnar Published