Who Should Get Priority for Transplants?
A general preference for young transplant recipients over old makes sense for society.
Q. Do you think that younger people should get priority over older people to receive organ transplants?
SEE ALSO: The Money and Ethics Quiz
A. In general, yes. That doesn't mean that Americans in their sixties and seventies shouldn't be permitted to get a transplant, but preference should be given to prospective recipients who are likely to get a greater benefit (that is, more years of productive life) from the operation -- say, favoring a 35-year-old over a 70-year-old.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Transplant organs are a scarce resource for which the limited supply has to be allocated in some way. Buying an organ is illegal in the U.S. and the vast majority of nations. A truly random lottery among medically suitable recipients could be used, but it isn't.
Instead, the U.S. uses a first-come, first-served system, in which eligible recipients of all ages -- screened for their likelihood to survive the operation and thrive -- are put on a waiting list in their home regions (and sometimes more than one region). The next available organ goes to the closest, sickest patient who is the best medical match for the organ.
The only age preference is for recipients under 18, who accounted for 16% of heart transplants in 2011. Over 18, there is no prioritizing by age, just by whether an available organ is a good match for the next recipient in line. A middle-aged heart that wouldn't be a good fit for a child might be given instead to an elderly patient who is further down the waiting list. Recipients 65 and over accounted for an estimated 12% of all U.S. heart transplants in 2008, with Medicare covering costs that can approach $1 million per procedure and recovery.
The more variables we introduce -- including but not limited to age -- the stickier the ethics get. Some argue for "social worth" and "merit/demerit" screens, under which, say, a mother of three young kids would get priority over a single person, a 60-year-old research scientist would get priority over a 20-year-old high school dropout, and a person who damaged his or her liver with heavy drinking would be ineligible for a new one. I think such criteria would be too subjective to be workable, but a general preference for young over old does make sense for society, ethically and economically.
Research for this column was done by editorial intern Ted Leonhardt from Duke University.
This article first appeared in Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine. For more help with your personal finances and investments, please subscribe to the magazine. It might be the best investment you ever make.
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Knight came to Kiplinger in 1983, after 13 years in daily newspaper journalism, the last six as Washington bureau chief of the Ottaway Newspapers division of Dow Jones. A frequent speaker before business audiences, he has appeared on NPR, CNN, Fox and CNBC, among other networks. Knight contributes to the weekly Kiplinger Letter.
-
How Lower Interest Rates Affect Your Finances: Credit Cards, Car Loans and Mortgages
The Fed's rate cut will provide relief for some borrowers, but savers will have to work harder to get decent returns.
By Sandra Block Published
-
Four Ways to Maximize Your 401(k) Contributions Before the Year Ends
To maximize your 410(k) contributions in 2024, assess how much you’ve contributed so far, check your employer’s match, take a look at your budget and consider increasing how much you set aside per paycheck.
By Kathryn Pomroy Published
-
Should All Student Debt Be Forgiven?
student loans My favorite reform would be making the repayment of all student loans proportional to the borrower’s future earnings.
By Knight Kiplinger Published
-
Should Lenders Mail Unsolicited Checks to Potential Borrowers?
credit & debt When it comes to preying on weak credit risks, it looks like Wall Street is at it again.
By Knight Kiplinger Published
-
Do Adult Children Have an Obligation to Support Needy Parents?
savings Even if some siblings can afford to help more than others, no one should shirk the obligation to assist in some way -- financial or otherwise.
By Knight Kiplinger Published
-
How Can the Approval Process for New Drugs Be Speeded Up?
investing There are many reform proposals, including some from free-market think tanks.
By Knight Kiplinger Published
-
Should Ethics Determine Who You Do Business With?
Smart Buying Consumers seeking to do business only with ethical companies should ask these questions.
By Knight Kiplinger Published
-
Should Colleges Use Collection Agencies for Overdue Student Bills?
college Colleges have many potent options for getting students to square their accounts.
By Knight Kiplinger Published
-
Hold Soda Makers to Account for Health Woes?
Business Costs & Regulation A strong case can be made that it’s unethical for companies to target the very customers who shouldn’t be heavy consumers of a given product.
By Knight Kiplinger Published
-
Ways to Protect Borrowers From Predatory Home Lending
real estate Land contracts drain low-income communities of resources.
By Knight Kiplinger Published