Second Stimulus Check Update: Senate Kills $2,000 Payments
Efforts to increase second-round stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000 died in the Senate. A new Congress will be sworn in on Sunday…perhaps they will revive the idea.
Efforts to send eligible Americans a $2,000 second stimulus check are effectively dead…for now. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) refused to allow a vote in the Senate on the House-passed CASH Act. That bill would have increased the second-round stimulus checks approved by the COVID-Related Tax Relief Act from $600 to $2,000. Senate Democrats made repeated requests this week for a vote, but each request was immediately blocked by McConnell or another Republican senator.
Democrats delayed the inevitable for a few days by holding up a separate vote to override President Trump's veto of the defense spending bill. However, on New Year's Day, the override vote was held, which meant that the Democrats lost whatever leverage they had to force a vote on the CASH Act. The current session of Congress ends at noon on Sunday. At that point, the CASH Act and all other pending bills will expire.
The IRS has already started sending out the $600 second stimulus checks authorized by the recently enacted COVID relief law. If a deal to increase payments to $2,000 had been reached, the tax agency said it would have sent another payment for the additional amount to anyone who already received a $600 check. That, however, won't be necessary now absent some unexpected change of circumstances before Sunday.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
[Stay on top of all the new stimulus bill developments – Sign up for the Kiplinger Today E-Newsletter. It's FREE!]
Momentum for $2,000 Second Stimulus Checks
For a while, it appeared as if there might be enough momentum behind the $2,000 second stimulus check effort to get it across the finish line. Right after the COVID relief bill authorizing $600 checks was passed by Congress, President Trump reignited the push for $2,000 payments by threatening to withhold his signature if the $600 second stimulus checks weren't increased. Then, after the president signed the bill, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives passed the CASH Act. In addition to boosting the already authorized $600 second stimulus checks up to $2,000 per eligible person, it would have increased the additional $600 payment for children 16 years of age or younger to $2,000 and allow these extra payments for all dependents, regardless of their age.
As President Trump continued to push for $2,000 second stimulus checks and concerns over the Georgian runoff elections surfaced, a handful of Republican Senators also climbed on the $2,000 payment bandwagon. By Tuesday, Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Marco Rubio (R-Fl.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Susan Collins (R-Me.), David Perdue (R-Ga.) and Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) all expressed support for $2,000 checks. (Perdue and Loeffler are involved in the close runoff elections in Georgia that could determine who controls the Senate for the next two years, and both their opponents favor $2,000 payments.) Although these Republican senators didn't directly say they would vote for the CASH Act itself (they simply liked the general idea of $2,000 checks), the idea that the CASH Act could receive the 60 votes it needed to pass in the Senate didn't seem too farfetched by Wednesday morning.
No Vote for the CASH Act in the Senate
However, once the CASH Act hit the Senate floor, it quickly became apparent that it was stuck in the mud. As mentioned, Democratic senators made repeated requests this week for a vote on the bill. But, each time, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) or one of his Republican colleagues blocked the request. The CASH Act couldn't get a vote on the Senate floor without Sen. McConnell's consent, and Democrats were not able to change the majority leader's mind and persuade him to allow the bill to move forward. On Wednesday, Sen. McConnell said the bill "has no realistic path to quickly pass the Senate." That statement signaled Sen. McConnell's reluctance to reverse course.
For Sen. McConnell and other Republicans opposing the bill, one of the primary reasons given for blocking a vote on the CASH Act was that the bill doesn't target people in need. For example, on Thursday, Sen. McConnell said the bill would "send thousands of dollars to people who don't need the help." He further noted that "a family of five where the parents earn $250,000 and have not seen any income loss this past year" would receive a $5,000 stimulus check under the CASH Act. This, he said, was "socialism for rich people." Sen. Thune (R-S.D.) described the bill as "a shotgun approach where a rifle makes a lot more sense."
Republicans also suggested that the $464 billion it would take to provide $2,000 checks under the CASH Act could be put to better use. For example, on Friday, Sen. Thune noted that "for the cost of the CASH Act, we could do another round of assistance to help small businesses keep their employees on the payroll and still, still have almost $200 billion left over." He added that, "the expanded unemployment benefit signed into law last week cost approximately $120 billion for 11 additional weeks. That means that we could provide more than [an] additional 40 weeks – 10 months of enhanced unemployment insurance benefits – for those who have lost their jobs for the same cost" as the CASH Act.
In response, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), referring to a study by the Tax Policy Center, claimed that less than 1% of the additional money proposed by the CASH Act would go to Americans with income in the top 5%. "Virtually nothing goes to the very, very rich," according to Sen. Sanders. "An overwhelming majority of those funds," he said, "go to the middle class, the working class, [and] low-income people."
As for spending $464 billion on other items, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) suggested boosting the second stimulus amount to $2,000 and providing more relief. During the New Year's Day debate on the Senate floor, he said the CASH Act "can be in addition to the expansion of unemployment insurance and other things. Given the state of the economy, that is what's needed."
McConnell's Alternative Bill
As an alternative to the CASH Act, Sen. McConnell introduced his own bill to provide $2,000 second stimulus checks. His bill would:
- Increase the base amount for second stimulus checks to $2,000, but not increase the additional amount for children or allow the additional payments for all dependents;
- Repeal a law protecting internet companies from liability for posts on their websites; and
- Set up an advisory committee to study the integrity and administration of the 2020 general election.
President Trump requested these are the three things when he signed the COVID relief bill establishing $600 stimulus checks.
However, this bill had no chance of being enacted into law. Even if the Senate passed the bill, the House would have to pass it as well. But the House has already adjourned for this legislative session. That brings us back to the CASH Act. According to Sen. Schumer (D-N.Y.), "there is one way and only one way to pass $2,000 checks before the end of the year," and that was to pass the CASH Act. To that end, on Thursday, he proposed holding three separate votes: One on the CASH Act, one on the internet company liability question, and one for the election study. On Friday, Sen. Sanders also tried to bring both the CASH Act and Sen. McConnell's bill to the floor for votes. Both proposals were rejected by Sen. McConnell and the Senate Republicans.
More Stimulus Checks in the Future?
On Friday, Sen. Schumer said, "today is the last chance to take up and pass the House bill to provide $2,000 checks to the American people." It didn't happen. With the current Congress ending and the CASH Act expiring on Sunday, the drive for additional stimulus checks – for $2,000 or any other amount – will therefore have to start from scratch.
For those who support additional stimulus checks, the good news is that the effort is likely to continue. Many lawmakers have already called for a third round of stimulus checks in 2021. President-Elect Joe Biden has also said he'll push for more direct payments (although he didn't suggest an amount for each check). So, despite the demise of the CASH Act, we still might see more – and higher – stimulus check payments down the road.
So, stay tuned. We'll report any new stimulus check developments as they occur. In the meantime, you can find more information about the $600 second stimulus checks already authorized by the recently enacted COVID relief law at Your Second Stimulus Check: How Much? When? And Other FAQs.
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Rocky Mengle was a Senior Tax Editor for Kiplinger from October 2018 to January 2023 with more than 20 years of experience covering federal and state tax developments. Before coming to Kiplinger, Rocky worked for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting, and Kleinrock Publishing, where he provided breaking news and guidance for CPAs, tax attorneys, and other tax professionals. He has also been quoted as an expert by USA Today, Forbes, U.S. News & World Report, Reuters, Accounting Today, and other media outlets. Rocky holds a law degree from the University of Connecticut and a B.A. in History from Salisbury University.
-
I Got Whooping Cough So You Don't Have To
Cases of whooping cough, or pertussis, have risen sharply this year. Here's my Dickensian experience of this disease that should be history.
By Ellen B. Kennedy Published
-
9 Best Books for the Newly Retired: Page-Turners to Inspire and Enjoy
The best books for newly retired people to read for inspiration and entertainment.
By Jacob Wolinsky Published
-
Should Rent Be Part of Your Retirement Plans?
Retirement Taxes Retiree renters may qualify for potential tax savings. Are you considering a move?
By Kate Schubel Published
-
On the Naughty List: Holiday Tax Scams to Look Out For
Tax Tips The IRS says scammers are on the prowl for your financial information. Know the signs so you don't fall victim.
By Kate Schubel Last updated
-
Retirement Abroad? Three Countries Without Inheritance Tax
Retirement Taxes These 2025 top-retiree-friendly countries have an added benefit: potential tax savings for you and your heirs.
By Kate Schubel Last updated
-
Five Tax-Savvy Ways To Donate This Holiday Season
Charitable Donations Food pantries, toy drives, and animal sanctuaries are popular ways to support others year-round.
By Gabriella Cruz-Martínez Published
-
Tax Pros: Is Someone Fraudulently Filing Returns With Your PTIN?
Tax Filing An unmonitored preparer tax identification number (PTIN) can lead to serious issues.
By Kelley R. Taylor Last updated
-
Are You a Renter? You Could Save on Taxes
Tax Breaks With these tax savings at your fingertips, rent may be more affordable
By Kate Schubel Last updated
-
2025 Open Enrollment: Some DACA Recipients Can Purchase Affordable Care Act Health Insurance
Open Enrollment Your eligibility to purchase health insurance from the federal marketplace may have changed. Here's what you need to know.
By Gabriella Cruz-Martínez Published
-
Holiday Office Party Taxes: Know Before You Go
Tax Tips The IRS could tax your gifts from Christmas raffles, Secret Santa, and White Elephant. Here’s how.
By Kate Schubel Last updated