Charitable giving vehicles can be powerful tools in maximizing philanthropic impact. Private foundations, charitable trusts and donor-advised funds (DAFs) all allow donors to invest charitable assets for growth, expand the assets they can give to charity, and help with due diligence around selecting causes and organizations to support. This kind of strategic support requires oversight and administration — both of which carry a cost.
Many factors influence your ability to earn a return. That’s true across all kinds of investing, including charitable investing, where "return" equates to "charitable impact" for the causes philanthropically minded investors care about. While we can't control markets or the economy, we can control the costs we pay in managing or allocating our charitable dollars.
Ultimately, investment data is clear: The expense ratio is the most proven predictor of future fund returns. Money paid in fees ultimately comes out of the sum of assets, which means there is less to invest, grow and use for grantmaking.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Understanding the nature of fees and costs and their impact on an individual’s ability to give is an essential component of an effective charitable giving strategy. That strategy starts with a deeper dive into the fees and how they differ across giving vehicles. When evaluating costs and fees in philanthropic giving, particularly in the context of private foundations and donor-advised funds (DAFs), here are a few key points to keep in mind.
Most charitable giving costs fall into two categories
Most of the costs associated with investing — whether it be for charitable giving, retirement or other purposes — come from one of two sources: investment fees and administrative fees.
Investment fees cover the costs of managing invested assets. Different asset classes will have different fees and overall costs, and different investment vehicles and advisers will as well.
Administrative fees cover general operating costs, including legal, accounting, processing and staffing expenses. These administrative fees can also vary greatly depending on the organization or individual overseeing the philanthropic strategy. Costs related to operations, and tools such as investor services, investment portals and research, may be included under administrative fees.
Different approaches come with different costs
The complexity and focus of the charitable investment vehicle can be a driving force in cost structure and overall fees. A private foundation can include services and approaches highly tailored to a family or donor’s specific needs. Naturally, those high-touch services can increase administrative fees. At the same time, advisers and other oversight or guidance can also drive up investment fees.
DAFs, a giving vehicle that can support a wide array of causes through grants to qualified 501(c)(3) charities, tend to prioritize a low-cost, high-impact approach to philanthropy. DAFs benefit from economies of scale around operations and grantmaking, with annual administrative fees among national DAF sponsors typically falling around 0.6%, and investment fees ranging from 0.015% to 0.99%. Community foundations may charge more for DAFs but may also offer useful philanthropic and granting guidance relevant to the communities they serve.
Certain DAF sponsors, including Vanguard Charitable, utilize additional levers to maintain low costs. These can include curating a smaller number of high-performing investment options, as well as giving donors access to low-cost share classes typically unavailable to the public.
There’s also a broader philosophical perspective around fees and costs worth exploring across giving vehicles. Some organizations align their entire approach around keeping costs low. At Vanguard Charitable, for instance, recent reductions in the expense ratios for several of its 35 investment options will lead to annual savings of more than $1 million, which will be granted by Vanguard Charitable donors to hardworking charities across the country and the world.
Savings — and tax benefits — compound over time
Investors like to call compound growth “the eighth wonder of the world.” And for good reason. Just like saving for retirement or any other investment approach, the positive effect of lower fees has a greater impact over time. These compound benefits play out on a few key fronts. Lower investment and administrative fees mean a greater portion of assets can be directed toward charitable investments. This, in turn, means more dollars are available to grant to nonprofits, deliver on a philanthropic strategy, and make an impact on meaningful cause areas.
The compound benefits extend to tax savings, too. The upfront tax savings for charitable contributions means more dollars are available to potentially grow and grant out over time. At the same time, the tax-free earnings for assets in an account compound over time, again allowing more money to be directed toward charitable giving. These tax savings can be achieved with both DAFs and private foundations, although private foundations are subject to a separate excise tax on net investment income, whereas DAFs are not.
Meaningful conversations around costs and charitable giving
Strategic charitable giving can seem complex. At the end of the day, the approach to costs is simple: Lower fees mean more money can be made available for the charities you care about.
Considerations around costs and fees are vital for charitable giving planning. Individuals and families looking to extend their philanthropic mission should explore these details, seeking out partners who are transparent about their fee structures and committed to keeping costs low. Ultimately, that commitment will allow donors to do more with their charitable dollars to continue supporting the causes that matter most to them — now and well into the future.
Related Content
-
What the Senate's Vote to Repeal CFPB Bank Overdraft Fees Cap Means For YouThe Senate voted to overturn the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's cap on overdraft fees. Here's what you need to know.
-
Ask the Editor: Four Reader Tax QuestionsAsk the Editor In our new Ask the Editor series, Joy Taylor, The Kiplinger Tax Letter Editor, answers questions related to filing of tax returns and paying taxes.
-
Retiring With a Pension? Four Things to KnowThe road to a secure retirement is slightly more intricate for people with pensions. Here are four key issues to consider to make the most out of yours.
-
How to Teach Your Kids About the Tax Facts of LifeTaxes are unavoidable, so it's important to teach children what to expect. Also, does your child need to file a tax return for 2024? Find out here.
-
Revocable Living Trusts: The Good, the Bad and the UglyPeople are conditioned to believe they should avoid probate at all costs, but when compared with living trusts, probate could be a smart choice for some folks.
-
How to Plan for Retirement When Your Child Has Special NeedsWhen your child has special needs, your retirement plan should include a plan for when you'll no longer be able to care for them yourself. A five-step guide.
-
Tax Advantages of Oil and Gas Investments: What You Need to KnowTax incentives allow for deductions and potential tax-free earnings — benefits accessible only to accredited investors in small producer projects.
-
Charitable Contributions: Five Frequently Asked QuestionsMake the most of your good intentions by understanding the ins and outs of charitable giving. A good starting point is knowing what's deductible and what isn't.
-
Financial Leverage, Part Two: Don't Say We Didn't Warn YouA lesson in how highly leveraged investments can benefit the first movers and crush the next round of buyers.
-
Taxes in Retirement: What ESOP Participants Need to KnowMost Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP) participants transfer company stock to an IRA starting around age 55, so taxes on that money have been deferred.
