The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has agreed to pay $418 million over four years and change certain rules to settle a series of lawsuits over the industry’s sales commission fees, a move expected to greatly decrease home-selling costs.
“No longer will homeowners be required under NAR rules to offer compensation to buyers agents," Michael Ketchmark, lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the case, told Kiplinger in an interview. The new rules "will return the sale of homes to the free market and allow technology to benefit sellers of homes."
Those changes will provide a huge opportunity for the cost of selling a home to drop dramatically, he added.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Under the settlement, which is pending court approval, NAR agreed to stop requiring homeowners to pay buyers agents commissions when they sell their homes, a practice in the U.S. that has been around for nearly 100 years, Ketchmark said. The average total commission rates in the U.S. — split between buyer and seller brokers — are 5% to 6% of the sale price, according to court documents.
NAR, which admits no wrongdoing in the case, has also agreed to draft new rules that prohibit broker compensation offers on its Multiple Listing Service (MLS) property database and that require MLS participants working with buyers to put their agreements in writing. These changes are set to become effective in mid-July.
The MLS has been used “as a vehicle for propping up and inflating commissions," Ketchmark said. “Probably the most significant part of the settlement is the changes to the way that homes are sold."
NAR, whose 1.5 million members make up the nation’s largest trade group, did not respond to a request for comment. In a statement, NAR sad it continues to encourage members to use buyer brokerage agreements that help consumers understand the services and value that will be provided.
“Ultimately, continuing to litigate would have hurt members and their small businesses,” Nykia Wright, interim CEO of NAR, said in the statement. “While there could be no perfect outcome, this agreement is the best outcome we could achieve in the circumstances.”
The settlement follows NAR’s loss in a district court case last October involving a conspiracy to artificially inflate commissions on home sales. A jury in that case ordered NAR and several real estate brokerages — including Berkshire Hathaway Energy-owned HomeServices of America — to pay about $1.8 billion in damages to roughly 500,000 home sellers in Missouri.
Non-negotiable commission rule challenged
In their suit, the home sellers challenged NAR’s rule requiring them to make non-negotiable commission offers to brokers to list their homes on MLS databases. A separate case involving similar charges and covering 14 states was also filed in Illinois.
NAR’s proposed settlement will resolve the Missouri and Illinois cases for all of those defendants — except for HomeServices of America, which is still litigating the Missouri judgement, Ketchmark said.
Wright said that NAR has worked hard for years to resolve the litigation “in a manner that benefits our members and American consumers.” The goal has been to preserve consumer choice and protect the group’s members to the greatest extent possible, she said, adding that the settlement achieves both of those goals.
The settlement is currently unavailable for the public to view but is expected to be filed next week. For more on the Missouri case, you can view the District Court for the Western District of Missouri Western Division filing here.
RELATED CONTENT
-
Three Ways President Trump Could Impact the EconomyThe Letter Some of Trump's top priorities could boost economic growth, but others risk fueling inflation.
-
Average Health Care Costs by Age: Can You Afford It?Expect to pay more as you age. We've got solutions for how to cover these costs, which can exceed $1,000 per month in your 60s.
-
The Cheapest Places To Retire in the USWhen you're trying to balance a fixed income with an enjoyable retirement, cost of living is a crucial factor to consider.
-
The Verizon Administrative Settlement Payment is a Reminder Class-Action Lawsuits Won't Make You RichPeople are receiving payouts from the Verizon administrative settlement and are surprised at how small they are. This provides a helpful financial lesson reminder.
-
Ignoring Your Company's Dress Code Can Get You FiredEmployers and prospective employees need to be upfront about expectations on the job regarding appearance, and other policies, before a job offer is accepted.
-
Should You Buy a Vacation Home?If you vacation to a beloved destination again and again, purchasing a home there may be a smart move — but don’t overlook the costs and effort that go into it.
-
Top 10 Myths About 1031 Exchanges, DebunkedAre you confused about 1031 exchanges? This brief guide busts the top myths about real estate's favorite tax-deferral strategy.
-
What You Need to Know About Working For YourselfWhether you’re looking for a side gig or planning to start your own business, it has never been easier to strike out on your own. Here is our guide to navigating working for yourself.
-
10 Ways Your 1031 Exchange Can Go Horribly WrongDon't let your tax-saving strategy become a financial nightmare — discover the hidden pitfalls that could turn your 1031 exchange into a costly disaster.
-
From Entrepreneur to Retiree: Boosting Your Business' ValueWhen business owners contemplate retirement, their first step should be maximizing the value of their biggest asset. Here are a few steps that could help.
