Worried about Passing Down a Big IRA? Consider a CRT

Since the mid-1970s, saving in a tax-deferred employer- sponsored retirement plan has been an easy way to save for retirement while also deferring current income tax. Many working Americans allocate a portion of their paychecks into 401(k)s, which can later be transferred to a traditional Individual Retirement Account (IRA). Others save directly in IRAs.

Taking lifetime IRA distributions can provide a retiree a comfortable standard of living long after she receives her final paycheck. Another benefit of saving in an IRA is that the investor’s children can continue to take distributions taxed as ordinary income following her death until the IRA is finally depleted. The strategy of saving in a tax-deferred plan and allowing a non-spouse beneficiary to take an extended stretch payout using a beneficiary IRA has been an important part of leaving a legacy for families. However, this changed with the passage of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (the SECURE Act), which went into effect on Jan. 1, 2020.

Only 10 Years to Drain Account without a Stretch IRA

Under the SECURE Act, with a few exceptions for minors, disabled beneficiaries or the chronically ill, a beneficiary who is not the IRA owner’s spouse must withdraw all funds from a beneficiary IRA within 10 years. Requiring a child or other non-spouse beneficiary to accept and pay income tax within 10 years on amounts held in a beneficiary IRA eliminates the common practice by beneficiaries and IRA owners of spreading distributions over a period greater than 10 years to create income tax advantages. Additionally, since some IRA owners hold a significant part of their investment holdings in traditional IRA accounts, a conduit trust (or trusteed IRA) was used to limit a beneficiary’s ability to immediately access IRA funds or to limit distributions to required minimum distributions for terms exceeding 10 years for both tax-deferral and creditor protection.

Subscribe to Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

Be a smarter, better informed investor.

Save up to 74%

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

Sign up

Due to the passage of the SECURE Act, the “stretch IRA” has been consigned by law to estate planning oblivion. But can anything else be done for those who may not want their children to be forced to realize income tax or to be allowed to have unconstrained access to your traditional IRA assets within 10 years?

Enter the CRT

The answer is yes, there is an option for extending IRA distributions to a child beyond the 10-year limit imposed by the SECURE Act. It involves using a tool familiar to estate planning professionals for those who are charitably inclined. A Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT) is a trust that provides for distributions of a fixed percentage or fixed amount to one or more beneficiaries for life or a term of less than 20 years. As the name implies, the remainder of the assets will be paid to one or more charities at the end of the trust term.

Charitable Remainder Trusts can provide that a fixed percentage of the trust assets at the time of inception will be given to the current individual beneficiaries, with the remainder being given to the charity — or charities, in the case of a Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust (CRAT). Alternatively, with a Charitable Remainder Unitrust (CRUT), the amount distributed to the individual beneficiaries will vary from year to year based on the changing value of the trust. With both types of trusts, the amount of the charity’s remainder interest must be at least 10% of the value of the trust at its inception.

One Hypothetical Family’s Story

Here’s an example of how a CRUT can be used to transfer money to a beneficiary while enjoying tax advantages:

Let’s say you inherit an IRA with a balance of $400,000 from your father. Under the SECURE Act, you will be required to take the balance within 10 years. If you take one-tenth ($40,000) in year one and you are in the 22% tax bracket, you will pay $8,800 in additional income tax for that year. If you decide to take the entire IRA balance in the first year, such a large distribution would automatically put you in at least the 35% tax bracket, meaning that you'd pay a minimum of $140,000 of additional income tax. If your total income puts you in the 37% tax bracket, the distribution would raise your tax bill by $148,000. If you are in the 22% tax bracket, in effect your $400,000 inheritance is worth only $312,000 at your father’s death or less if you choose to take a lump sum. Additionally, any gains or growth within the IRA are also taxed at your income tax rate when a distribution is made.

Now, let’s look at how the distribution of this money would work differently using a CRUT. Let’s say your father names a CRUT as beneficiary of his $400,000 IRA, and you are the recipient of a 7% unitrust payment for the lesser of your lifetime or 20 years. Since there is a qualified charity as the ultimate beneficiary, the CRUT can immediately take the full value of the IRA tax free, so the CRUT is funded with $400,000. The trust is invested in bonds and growth stocks that net $4,000 income after expenses — importantly, for tax purposes, you are not taxed on the capital gains. In the first year, you receive 7% of the total amount, or $28,000. The $4,000 attributed to income that the trust earned is allocated to you under applicable tax law. Of that distribution, you will pay only $880 in additional income tax ($4,000 x 22%). The tax saving is more dramatic if you are in a higher tax bracket.

Using a CRT to extend distributions from a traditional IRA may have certain tax advantages and can complement, but generally does not replace, other estate planning. It can be particularly effective when your current beneficiary has taxable income from other sources and resources in addition to the beneficiary IRA. Alternatively, it can be effective in protecting the IRA assets from a beneficiary’s creditors or for planning with potential marital property while providing the beneficiary a lengthy predictable income stream.

Using a Charitable Remainder Trust for planning with an IRA or other assets has many tax and estate planning advantages beyond the scope of this brief article. My purpose is to introduce another option for those who wish to give IRA assets to their beneficiaries but want an alternative to the 10-year payout period imposed by the SECURE Act.

Estate planning attorneys, financial planners and trust advisers welcome conversations about planning strategies carefully designed to meet your needs and those of your family. A CRT may not be the best strategy for your circumstances, but let this article start the conversation.