What a Federal Grants Pause Could Have Meant for Social Security and Medicare
The White House rescinded a pause on all Federal grants and loans, but the short-lived action shined a light on what could come in the future.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cf34/5cf3400d522fa44d4f6f0069188b3c46fdcaa469" alt="White House with social security card overlay"
Retirees can breathe a sigh of relief, at least for now. While the White House budget office ordered a pause on all federal grants and loans effective as of 5:00 pm on Tuesday January 28, the short-lived action was rescinded Wednesday after it caused chaos and confusion. While Social Security and Medicare were excluded from the list, other programs that provide support to older adults could have lost temporary funding.
“OMB Memorandum M-25-13 is rescinded. If you have questions about implementing the President’s Executive Orders, please contact your agency General Counsel,” a memo obtained by CNN read.
It's not surprising that the White House backtracked. In addition to a federal judge Tuesday temporarily blocking the funding freeze, according to the Associated Press (AP) , the move faced fierce criticism.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad446/ad4469636a070414c6faa42e0035473488c03064" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hwgJ7osrMtUWhk5koeVme7-200-80.png"
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Even after the OMB Memorandum was rescinded, questions remained about the federal funding pause after comments made by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on X who wrote: "This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo. Why? To end any confusion created by the court's injunction. The President's EO's on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented."
Her comments added to the confusion, as it was the rescinded memo and not the executive orders that described a temporary pause in funding. It's not clear what the White House will do next.
When announcing the funding freeze, Matthew J. Vaeth, acting director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) wrote in a memorandum that of the close to $10 trillion spent by the federal government, over 30%, or $3 trillion, went to federal financial assistance, such as grants and loans.
“Financial assistance should be dedicated to advancing administration priorities, focusing taxpayer dollars to advance a stronger and safer America, eliminating the financial burden of inflation for citizens, unleashing American energy and manufacturing, ending ‘wokeness’ and the weaponization of government, promoting efficiency in government, and Making America Healthy Again,” wrote Vaeth.
Vaeth said that taxpayer dollars should not be used for programs that do not "improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve" or are ideological in nature.
Vaeth said the pause would give the Administration time to review agency programs and determine the best use of the funding in line with the laws and President Donald Trump’s priorities. In a footnote, Vaeth said, “Nothing in this memo should be construed to impact Medicare or Social Security benefits.”
Social Security and Medicare safe for now
It’s unclear what impact a spending pause would have had on many federal financial assistance programs. Still, Democrats said it could impact disaster relief, aid to the nation’s seniors and school lunch programs, among many other programs.
Originally all agencies had until February 10 to submit detailed information to the OMB on any of the programs, projects and activities subject to the pause. Any funding not aligned with President Trump’s executive orders and agenda could be on the chopping block. The memo did make clear that in addition to Social Security and Medicare, the pause would not have included assistance provided directly to individuals.
In a letter to Vaeth, Senate Appropriations Committee Vice Chair Patty Murray and House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro raised the alarm on what they called President Trump’s unlawful executive orders and the new memoranda issued by OMB directing agencies to withhold vast swaths of approved federal funding.
“As leaders of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, we write with extreme alarm about the Administration’s efforts to undermine Congress’s power of the purse, threaten our national security, and deny resources for states, localities, American families, and businesses,” wrote the legislators. “The scope of what you are ordering is breathtaking, unprecedented, and will have devastating consequences across the country. We write today to urge you in the strongest possible terms to uphold the law and the Constitution and ensure all federal resources are delivered in accordance with the law.”
Bottom line
Since President Trump began his second term he has signed a flurry of executive orders to better align the government with his vision for America. So far Social Security and Medicare has been untouchable, which is good news for retirees relying on these important benefits.
Related content
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Donna Fuscaldo is the retirement writer at Kiplinger.com. A writer and editor focused on retirement savings, planning, travel and lifestyle, Donna brings over two decades of experience working with publications including AARP, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Investopedia and HerMoney.
-
Caregiving Is a Stealth Retirement Expense for Women: I Should Know
Eldercare takes a toll on everyone, but women's careers tend to suffer more — with dire consequences over the long term.
By MP Dunleavey Published
-
Listed: 3 Homes for Retiring in Portland, Maine
Three real estate listings in Portland, Maine.
By Alexandra Svokos Published
-
Listed: Three Homes for Retiring in Portland, Maine
Three real estate listings in Portland, Maine.
By Alexandra Svokos Published
-
The Golden Window: A Top Tax Strategy for the Right Retirees
Maximize your retirement savings and minimize your tax burdens by taking advantage of the strategic 'Golden Window' before Social Security and RMDs begin.
By Tony Kure, CFP® Published
-
Roth or Traditional? Seven Considerations for High Earners
Retirement savings and taxes are a minefield — and the higher your income, the more complicated the options. Use these tips to find your way forward.
By Tim Kingsbury, CFP® Published
-
The Social Security Fairness Act: Good News for Retirees?
Millions will be affected by new rules that boost Social Security benefits. But if you qualify, there may be knock-on effects on your retirement cash flow.
By Evan T. Beach, CFP®, AWMA® Published
-
Social Security Administration Warns of Massive Layoffs: What It Means to You
The Social Security Administration is gearing up to layoff thousands of workers. Here’s how it can impact you.
By Donna Fuscaldo Published
-
Private Jets Are Within Reach for Wealthy Retirees
Realizing an adult fantasy like booking a private jet doesn’t come cheap. But so what?
By Yvette C. Hammett Published
-
Want to Hire a Financial Planning Firm? Five Questions to Ask
The key to finding a financial planner who will do great work for you and your family is knowing what to look for during your search.
By Joe F. Schmitz Jr., CFP®, ChFC® Published
-
The Six People You Need to Talk with Before Retiring — and the Best Questions to Ask
It takes a team of people to build a great retirement plan. Here are the experts you need to reach out to before you make your big move.
By Brian O'Connell Published