Two Consequential Tax Cases You May Not Have Heard About
The Supreme Court's decisions in these cases create uncertainty about challenging IRS regulations and guidance. Expect more litigation to follow.
Two of the most consequential Supreme Court cases affecting income tax planning did not directly involve income tax issues and did not even include the word “tax” in the opinion. Nevertheless, these cases substantially affect the enforceability of IRS regulations and guidance. The full effect of these decisions will almost certainly require additional litigation in the years to come.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Docket No. 22-451) was issued by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 28, 2024. Since 1984, courts were required to give deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. That rule was established in Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984) (467 U.S. 877). Loper overruled the long-standing rule providing judicial deference to agency (including the IRS) interpretations of ambiguous statutes. This deference in simple terms created an “uphill battle” to challenge IRS regulations.
The Supreme Court determined that the rule established by Chevron did not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act. The Supreme Court even looked back to 1803 and held that the Chevron rule of deference violated the landmark holding of the Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803) (5 U.S. 137), which held that the court decides legal questions by using its own judgment. The net result for tax cases is that the court now decides the best interpretation of a contested statute and not the IRS.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
A much different standard
Prior to Loper, the court would determine whether the IRS interpretation was permissible — a much different standard for a taxpayer challenging the IRS interpretation.
Loper recognizes that judicial deference may be appropriate if the statute itself provides that the IRS is to issue regulations or guidance. Even in that case, Loper provides that the courts still have independent authority to police the outer boundaries of the regulations and to ensure that the IRS exercises its discretion in a manner consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act.
Right after Loper, on July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court issued Corner Post, Inc. v. Federal Reserve (Docket No. 22-1008). Corner Post provides that the six-year statute of limitations in 28 USC Section 2401 began to run when the plaintiffs actually suffered an injury rather than from when the rule, regulation or statute became final.
The Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) prevents pre-enforcement of judicial review. If the statute of limitations begins with the date of enactment of the regulation, then the six-year statute under Section 2401 of the AIA would run before the plaintiff, or anyone, could satisfy the requirements for a challenge. The effect of Loper is that a newly created entity would appear to be able to challenge a long-standing regulation that was otherwise believed to be final and not subject to challenge. In the past, the government used Section 2401 of the AIA to prevent judicial challenges to regulations.
Expect more litigation
We can expect to see more litigation due to the uncertainty created by Loper and Corner Post. Taxpayers may now be able to challenge regulations finalized 10 or 20 years ago and otherwise believed to be immune from such challenges. Courts no longer must give deference to the IRS' interpretation of regulations. Taxpayers can now more easily argue for meanings different than those asserted by the IRS.
We can be certain that we have interesting times ahead.
Taxpayers with positions well-reasoned and founded on case law or other authority may now be more willing to pursue positions contrary to IRS regulations. When challenged, the court can more easily accept a contrary position. This is true even for regulations that have been in place for many years.
Related Content
- Supreme Court Strikes Down Chevron: What It Means for the IRS
- How Four Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impact Your Money
- Murdochs' Dispute Highlights Benefits of Trusts in Nevada
- Nine Lessons to Be Learned From the Hilton Family Trust Contest
- What We Can Learn from Tony Bennett's Estate Dispute
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — free
Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.
Founder of The Goralka Law Firm, John M. Goralka assists business owners, real estate owners and successful families to achieve their enlightened dreams by better protecting their assets, minimizing income and estate tax and resolving messes and transitions to preserve, protect and enhance their legacy. John is one of few California attorneys certified as a Specialist by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization in both Taxation and Estate Planning, Trust and Probate. You can read more of John's articles on the Kiplinger Advisor Collective.
-
How Lower Interest Rates Affect Your Finances: Credit Cards, Car Loans and Mortgages
The Fed's rate cut will provide relief for some borrowers, but savers will have to work harder to get decent returns.
By Sandra Block Published
-
Four Ways to Maximize Your 401(k) Contributions Before the Year Ends
To maximize your 410(k) contributions in 2024, assess how much you’ve contributed so far, check your employer’s match, take a look at your budget and consider increasing how much you set aside per paycheck.
By Kathryn Pomroy Published
-
For a More Secure Retirement, Build in Some 'Safe Money'
To solidify your retirement plan, write it down, reduce your market risk and allocate more safe money into your plan for income.
By Kevin Wade Published
-
Five Steps to a Mindfully Fearless Career
If, like many women, you're struggling with imposter syndrome, try developing an athlete's winning mindset. It's as simple as facing one small fear every day.
By Lisa Cregan Published
-
Stock Market Today: Stocks Rally Despite Rising Geopolitical Tension
The main indexes were mixed on Tuesday but closed well off their lows after an early flight to safety.
By David Dittman Published
-
What's at Stake for Alphabet as DOJ Eyes Google's Chrome
Alphabet is higher Tuesday even as antitrust officials at the DOJ support forcing Google to sell its popular web browser. Here's what you need to know.
By Joey Solitro Published
-
Lowe's Stock Is Falling After Earnings. Here's Why
Lowe's stock is lower Tuesday as Wall Street weighs a beat-and-raise quarter against declining revenue. This is what you need to know.
By Joey Solitro Published
-
Why Walmart Stock's a Buy After Its Beat-And-Raise Quarter
Walmart is the best Dow Jones stock Tuesday after the retail giant's solid earnings report and outlook and Wall Street thinks it's just getting started. Here's what they're saying.
By Joey Solitro Published
-
Winners and Losers of Fed Rate Cuts
Navigating interest-rate changes can seem daunting, but these areas of the fixed-income market could perform better (or worse) than others.
By Jeffrey R. Kosnett Published
-
Six Ways to Optimize Your Charitable Giving Before Year-End
As 2024 winds down, right now is the time to look at how you plan to handle your charitable giving. The sooner you start, the more tax-efficient you can be.
By Julia Chu Published